CODEWITHSUNDEEP
javaversion-controlbytecode
barak manos
barak manos

Reputation: 30136

Why do I get a different 'class' file after changing only symbol names?

Why does the Java byte-code interpreter change a 'class' file when I change only symbol names (classes, interfaces, functions or variables) in the corresponding 'java' file?

I am maintaining both types under source control (GIT), and I keep seeing "twice the amount of changed files" even for cosmetic changes such as the one mentioned above.

BTW, the question is not on source-control issues, but just FYI, the reason I keep these files on GIT is in order to be able to do "clean up" (delete all unversioned files), and then run the program from a command-line without recompiling it.

If you have any idea how to achieve this functionality (run without build) otherwise, then I would be happy to hear it...

Thanks

Upvotes: 0

Views: 154

Answers (2)

Dawood ibn Kareem
Dawood ibn Kareem

Reputation: 79848

The JVM needs access to the symbol names, for a number of reasons, including the following.

  • The JVM uses symbol names to find classes, methods and so on.
  • The presence of symbol names enables us to write code that uses reflection.
  • Symbol names appear in stack traces when an exception is thrown.

So the symbol names need to be stored in the class path.

Upvotes: 2

Stack Exchange Broke The Law
Stack Exchange Broke The Law

Reputation: 58888

Because the class files contain the symbol names.

Generally, people do not keep their class files in source control. If someone wants an old version of a class file, they get the old source file and compile it.

Upvotes: 7

Related Questions