CODEWITHSUNDEEP
javacachingguavasoft-references
sanity
sanity

Reputation: 35772

How do I efficiently cache objects in Java using available RAM?

I need to cache objects in Java using a proportion of whatever RAM is available. I'm aware that others have asked this question, but none of the responses meet my requirements.

My requirements are:

I tried LinkedHashMap, however it requires you to specify a maximum number of elements, and I don't know how many elements it will take to fill up available RAM (their sizes will vary significantly).

My current approach is to use Google Collection's MapMaker as follows:

Map<String, Object> cache = new MapMaker().softKeys().makeMap();

This seemed attractive as it should automatically delete elements when it needs more RAM, however there is a serious problem: its behavior is to fill up all available RAM, at which point the GC begins to thrash and the whole app's performance deteriorates dramatically.

I've heard of stuff like EHCache, but it seems quite heavy-weight for what I need, and I'm not sure if it is fast enough for my application (remembering that the solution can't be dramatically slower than a HashMap).

Upvotes: 26

Views: 11959

Answers (12)

Kevin Bourrillion
Kevin Bourrillion

Reputation: 40851

I believe MapMaker is going to be the only reasonable way to get what you're asking for. If "the GC begins to thrash and the whole app's performance deteriorates dramatically," you should spend some time properly setting the various tuning parameters. This document may seem a little intimidating at first, but it's actually written very clearly and is a goldmine of helpful information about GC:

https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/memorymanagement-whitepaper-150215.pdf

Upvotes: 2

hqt
hqt

Reputation: 30266

Caching something, SoftReference maybe the best way until now I can imagine.

Or you can reinvent an Object-pool. That every object you doesn't use, you don't need to destroy it. But it to save CPU rather than save memory

Upvotes: 0

Jonathan
Jonathan

Reputation: 96

I've got similar requirements to you - concurrency (on 2 hexacore CPUs) and LRU or similar - and also tried Guava MapMaker. I found softValues() much slower than weakValues(), but both made my app excruciatingly slow when memory filled up.

I tried WeakHashMap and it was less problematic, oddly even faster than using LinkedHashMap as an LRU cache via its removeEldestEntry() method.

But by the fastest for me is ConcurrentLinkedHashMap which has made my app 3-4 (!!) times faster than any other cache I tried. Joy, after days of frustration! It's apparently been incorporated into Guava's MapMaker, but the LRU feature isn't in Guava r07 at any rate. Hope it works for you.

Upvotes: 8

omerkudat
omerkudat

Reputation: 10051

I don't know if this would be a simple solution, especially compared with EHCache or similar, but have you looked at the Javolution library? It is not designed for as such, but in the javolution.context package they have an Allocator pattern which can reuse objects without the need for garbage collection. This way they keep object creation and garbage collection to a minimum, an important feature for real-time programming. Perhaps you should take a look and try to adapt it to your problem.

Upvotes: 1

Pascal Thivent
Pascal Thivent

Reputation: 570295

I've heard of stuff like EHCache, but it seems quite heavy-weight for what I need, and I'm not sure if it is fast enough for my application (remembering that the solution can't be dramatically slower than a HashMap).

I really don't know if one can say that EHCache is heavy-weight. At least, I do not consider EHCache as such, especially when using a Memory Store (which is backed by an extended LinkedHashMap and is of course the the fastest caching option). You should give it a try.

Upvotes: 3

Eli Acherkan
Eli Acherkan

Reputation: 6411

I'm not aware of an easy way to find out an object's size in Java. Therefore, I don't think you'll find a way to limit a data structure by the amount of RAM it's taking.

Based on this assumption, you're stuck with limiting it by the number of cached objects. I'd suggest running simulations of a few real-life usage scenarios and gathering statistics on the types of objects that go into the cache. Then you can calculate the statistically average size, and the number of objects you can afford to cache. Even though it's only an approximation of the amount of RAM you want to dedicate to the cache, it might be good enough.

As to the cache implementation, in my project (a performance-critical application) we're using EhCache, and personally I don't find it to be heavyweight at all.

In any case, run several tests with several different configurations (regarding size, eviction policy etc.) and find out what works best for you.

Upvotes: 0

pgras
pgras

Reputation: 12770

You cannot "delete elements" you can only stop to hard reference them and wait for the GC to clean them, so go on with Google Collections...

Upvotes: 0

ralph
ralph

Reputation: 1017

In the past I have used JCS. You can set up the configuration to try and meet you needs. I'm not sure if this will meet all of your requirements/needs but I found it to be pretty powerful when I used it.

Upvotes: 0

stacker
stacker

Reputation: 68942

I've implemented serval caches and it's probably as difficult as implementing a new datasource or threadpool, my recommendation is use jboss-cache or a another well known caching lib. So you will sleep well without issues

Upvotes: 4

Steve Emmerson
Steve Emmerson

Reputation: 7832

Assuming you want the cache to be thread-safe, then you should examine the cache example in Brian Goetz's book "Java Concurrency in Practice". I can't recommend this highly enough.

Upvotes: -3

Lachlan Roche
Lachlan Roche

Reputation: 25946

Using your existing cache, store WeakReference rather than normal object refererences.

If GC starts running out of free space, the values held by WeakReferences will be released.

Upvotes: 0

Kevin
Kevin

Reputation: 30419

This seemed attractive as it should automatically delete elements when it needs more RAM, however there is a serious problem: its behavior is to fill up all available RAM

Using soft keys just allows the garbage collector to remove objects from the cache when no other objects reference them (i.e., when the only thing referring to the cache key is the cache itself). It does not guarantee any other kind of expulsion.

Most solutions you find will be features added on top of the java Map classes, including EhCache.

Have you looked at the commons-collections LRUMap?

Note that there is an open issue against MapMaker to provide LRU/MRU functionality. Perhaps you can voice your opinion there as well

Upvotes: 0

Related Questions