Dilshod
Dilshod

Reputation: 3331

Using BindingOperations.EnableCollectionSynchronization

I have two WPF applications "UI", "Debugger" and one ClassLibrary "BL". UI references to Debugger and BL. Debugger references to BL. I have collection in BL called MyCollection. UI app starts the Debugger app and Debugger binds to a collection MyCollection in BL. When I try changing the MyCollection collection from UI app I am getting exception.

A first chance exception of type 'System.NotSupportedException' occurred in PresentationFramework.dll

Additional information: This type of CollectionView does not support changes to its SourceCollection from a thread different from the Dispatcher thread.

I was googling around and found this: BindingOperations.EnableCollectionSynchronization I can't figure out how to use it. I don't want to reference to any UI dlls from my BL project. Can anybody assist me on that?

Thanks for the help!

Upvotes: 24

Views: 32922

Answers (5)

Drew Noakes
Drew Noakes

Reputation: 311255

All the examples I've seen on Stack Overflow for this get it wrong. You must lock the collection when modifying it from another thread.

On dispatcher (UI) thread:

_itemsLock = new object();
Items = new ObservableCollection<Item>();
BindingOperations.EnableCollectionSynchronization(Items, _itemsLock);

Then from another thread:

lock (_itemsLock)
{
    // Once locked, you can manipulate the collection safely from another thread
    Items.Add(new Item());
    Items.RemoveAt(0);
}

More information in this article: http://10rem.net/blog/2012/01/20/wpf-45-cross-thread-collection-synchronization-redux

Upvotes: 70

Shannon
Shannon

Reputation: 54

A WPF application can display a collection of data using an ItemsControl or one of its subclasses (ListBox, DataGrid, TreeView, ListView, etc.). WPF channels all its access to the collection through a subclass of CollectionView. Both the ItemsControl and the CollectionView have affinity to the thread on which the ItemsControl was created, meaning that using them on a different thread is forbidden and throws an exception. In effect, this restriction applies to the collection as well. You may want to use the collection on multiple threads. For example, you want to update the collection (add or remove items) on a "data-gathering" thread, while displaying the results on a "user interface" thread, so that the UI remains responsive while data-gathering is happening. In such a situation, you are responsible for ensuring synchronized ("thread-safe") access to the collection. This is typically done using either a simple lock mechanism or a more elaborate synchronization mechanism such as semaphores, reset events, etc. While you must synchronize your application's access to the collection, you must also guarantee that access from WPF (specifically from CollectionView) participates in the same synchronization mechanism. You do this by calling the EnableCollectionSynchronization method.

The DOC remark this very nice, I think you should have a look: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.windows.data.bindingoperations.enablecollectionsynchronization?view=netcore-3.1

Upvotes: 0

Marco
Marco

Reputation: 2245

In this blog you find an easy tutorial how to work with BindingOperations...it is quite easy.

Upvotes: -3

Sandesh
Sandesh

Reputation: 3004

I am not sure if this will help but still you can give it a try.

Add a Property in Debugger which will hold the Collection from BL like

private ObservableCollection<string> _data = new ObservableCollection<string>();
private object _lock = new object();

public ObservableCollection<string> Data { get {return _data;} }

In the constructor just add the below line

BindingOperations.EnableCollectionSynchronization(_data, _lock);

this will above line will take care of thread safety.

Below is the example

ViewModel (Debugger)

internal class ViewModelClass : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
    private object _lock = new object ();
    private ObservableCollection<string> _data;

    public ObservableCollection<string> Data
    {
        get { return _data; }
        private set
        {
            _data = value;
            RaisePropertyChanged ("Data");
        }
    }

    private string _enteredText;
    public string EnteredText
    {
        get { return _enteredText; }
        set
        {
            _enteredText = value;
            _data.Add (value); RaisePropertyChanged ("EnteredText");
        }
    }

    private void RaisePropertyChanged (string name)
    {
        var pc = PropertyChanged;
        if (pc != null)
            pc (this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs (name));
    }

    public ViewModelClass ()
    {
        var _model = new ModelClass ();
        Data = _model.Data;
        _data.CollectionChanged += (s, e) => RaisePropertyChanged ("Data");
    }

    public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
}

Model(BL)

internal class ModelClass
{
    private ObservableCollection<string> _data;

    public ObservableCollection<string> Data
    {
        get { return _data; }
        private set { _data = value; }
    }

    public ModelClass ()
    {
        _data = new ObservableCollection<string> { "Test1", "Test2", "Test3" };
    }
}

MainWindow.xaml.cs

public partial class MainWindow : Window
{
    public MainWindow ()
    {
        InitializeComponent ();
        this.DataContext = new ViewModelClass ();
    }
}

MainWindow.xaml

<Window x:Class="CollectionSynchronizationTest.MainWindow"
            xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
            xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
            Title="MainWindow"
            Height="350"
            Width="525">
<StackPanel>
    <ComboBox IsEditable="True"
                        ItemsSource="{Binding Data}"
                        Text="{Binding EnteredText, Mode=TwoWay, UpdateSourceTrigger=LostFocus}" />
    <Button Content="Test" />
</StackPanel>

When the window loads just enter "SomeValue" in the ComboBox and then after pressing the Tab key you should find the new value in the ComboBox dropdown

Upvotes: 3

Herm
Herm

Reputation: 2999

I could not figure out how to use it, either, when I had the same problem.

I ended with my own collection type where I store the dispatcher and use it when necessary. Note that my naming was very poor, this collection is not threadsafe, far from it.

public class ThreadableObservableCollection<T> : ObservableCollection<T>
{
    private readonly Dispatcher _dispatcher;
    public ThreadableObservableCollection()
    {
      _dispatcher = Dispatcher.CurrentDispatcher;
    }

    public void ThreadsafeRemove(T item, Action callback)
    {
      if (_dispatcher.CheckAccess())
      {
        Remove(item);
        callback();
      }
      else
      {
        _dispatcher.Invoke(() =>
          {
            Remove(item);
            callback();
          });
      }
    }

    public void ThreadsafeInsert(int pos, T item, Action callback)
    {
      if (_dispatcher.CheckAccess())
      {
        Insert(pos, item);
        callback();
      }
      else
      {
        _dispatcher.Invoke(() =>
          {
            Insert(pos, item);
            callback();
          });
      }
    }
  }

Upvotes: -5

Related Questions