Reputation: 9401
I'd like to have loglevel TRACE (5) for my application, as I don't think that debug()
is sufficient. Additionally log(5, msg)
isn't what I want. How can I add a custom loglevel to a Python logger?
I've a mylogger.py
with the following content:
import logging
@property
def log(obj):
myLogger = logging.getLogger(obj.__class__.__name__)
return myLogger
In my code I use it in the following way:
class ExampleClass(object):
from mylogger import log
def __init__(self):
'''The constructor with the logger'''
self.log.debug("Init runs")
Now I'd like to call self.log.trace("foo bar")
Edit (Dec 8th 2016): I changed the accepted answer to pfa's which is, IMHO, an excellent solution based on the very good proposal from Eric S.
Upvotes: 191
Views: 116014
Reputation: 60
Here's what works for Python3.10.12:
# your-loggings.py
import logging
TRACE = logging.DEBUG + 5
logging.addLevelName(TRACE, "TRACE")
def trace(instance: logging.Logger, msg, *args, **kwargs):
if instance.isEnabledFor(TRACE):
instance._log(TRACE, msg, args, *kwargs)
logging.Logger.trace = trace
Usage:
# your-module.py
logger = logging.getLogger()
logger.trace("Something")
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 11
I recombined all the best answers (especially https://stackoverflow.com/a/35804945 and https://stackoverflow.com/a/55276759) from the thread and got IMO universal and most pythonic way below:
import logging
from functools import partial, partialmethod
def add_logging_level(level_name, level_num, method_name=None):
"""
Comprehensively adds a new logging level to the `logging` module and the
currently configured logging class.
`level_name` becomes an attribute of the `logging` module with the value
`level_num`.
`methodName` becomes a convenience method for both `logging` itself
and the class returned by `logging.getLoggerClass()` (usually just
`logging.Logger`).
If `methodName` is not specified, `levelName.lower()` is used.
To avoid accidental clobberings of existing attributes, this method will
raise an `AttributeError` if the level name is already an attribute of the
`logging` module or if the method name is already present
Example
-------
>>> add_logging_level('TRACE', logging.DEBUG - 5)
>>> logging.getLogger(__name__).setLevel('TRACE')
>>> logging.getLogger(__name__).trace('that worked')
>>> logging.trace('so did this')
>>> logging.TRACE
5
"""
if not method_name:
method_name = level_name.lower()
if hasattr(logging, level_name):
raise AttributeError(f'{level_name} already defined in logging module')
if hasattr(logging, method_name):
raise AttributeError(
f'{method_name} already defined in logging module'
)
if hasattr(logging.getLoggerClass(), method_name):
raise AttributeError(f'{method_name} already defined in logger class')
# This method was inspired by the answers to Stack Overflow post
# http://stackoverflow.com/q/2183233/2988730, especially
# https://stackoverflow.com/a/35804945
# https://stackoverflow.com/a/55276759
logging.addLevelName(level_num, level_name)
setattr(logging, level_name, level_num)
setattr(
logging.getLoggerClass(), method_name,
partialmethod(logging.getLoggerClass().log, level_num)
)
setattr(logging, method_name, partial(logging.log, level_num))
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 31
Following up on the top-rated answers by Eric S. and Mad Physicist:
Fixed example that checks if the logging level is enabled:
import logging DEBUG_LEVELV_NUM = 9 logging.addLevelName(DEBUG_LEVELV_NUM, "DEBUGV") def debugv(self, message, *args, **kws): if self.isEnabledFor(DEBUG_LEVELV_NUM): # Yes, logger takes its '*args' as 'args'. self._log(DEBUG_LEVELV_NUM, message, args, **kws) logging.Logger.debugv = debugv
This code-snippet
debugv
-method, which logs a message with level "DEBUGV" unless the log-level is set to a value higher than 9 (e.g. log-level "DEBUG")logging.Logger
-class, so that you can call logger.debugv
The suggested implementation worked well for me, but
logger.debugv
-methoddebugv
-member method of the Logger
-class (see https://github.com/microsoft/pylance-release/issues/2335 about dynamically adding member-methods)I ended up using inheritance as was suggested in Noufal Ibrahim's answer in this thread:
I think you'll have to subclass the Logger class and add a method called trace which basically calls Logger.log with a level lower than DEBUG. I haven't tried this but this is what the docs indicate.
Implementing Noufal Ibrahim's suggestion worked and pyright is happy:
import logging
# add log-level DEBUGV
DEBUGV = 9 # slightly lower than DEBUG (10)
logging.addLevelName(DEBUGV, "DEBUGV")
class MyLogger(logging.Logger):
"""Inherit from standard Logger and add level DEBUGV."""
def debugv(self, msg, *args, **kwargs):
"""Log 'msg % args' with severity 'DEBUGV'."""
if self.isEnabledFor(DEBUGV):
self._log(DEBUGV, msg, args, **kwargs)
logging.setLoggerClass(MyLogger)
Next you can initialise an instance of the extended logger using the logger-manager:
logger = logging.getLogger("whatever_logger_name")
Edit: In order to make pyright recognise the debugv
-method, you may need to cast the logger returned by logging.getLogger
, which would like this:
import logging
from typing import cast
logger = cast(MyLogger, logging.getLogger("whatever_logger_name"))
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 114440
Combining all of the existing answers with a bunch of usage experience, I think that I have come up with a list of all the things that need to be done to ensure completely seamless usage of the new level. The steps below assume that you are adding a new level TRACE
with value logging.DEBUG - 5 == 5
:
logging.addLevelName(logging.DEBUG - 5, 'TRACE')
needs to be invoked to get the new level registered internally so that it can be referenced by name.logging
itself for consistency: logging.TRACE = logging.DEBUG - 5
.trace
needs to be added to the logging
module. It should behave just like debug
, info
, etc.trace
needs to be added to the currently configured logger class. Since this is not 100% guaranteed to be logging.Logger
, use logging.getLoggerClass()
instead.All the steps are illustrated in the method below:
def addLoggingLevel(levelName, levelNum, methodName=None):
"""
Comprehensively adds a new logging level to the `logging` module and the
currently configured logging class.
`levelName` becomes an attribute of the `logging` module with the value
`levelNum`. `methodName` becomes a convenience method for both `logging`
itself and the class returned by `logging.getLoggerClass()` (usually just
`logging.Logger`). If `methodName` is not specified, `levelName.lower()` is
used.
To avoid accidental clobberings of existing attributes, this method will
raise an `AttributeError` if the level name is already an attribute of the
`logging` module or if the method name is already present
Example
-------
>>> addLoggingLevel('TRACE', logging.DEBUG - 5)
>>> logging.getLogger(__name__).setLevel("TRACE")
>>> logging.getLogger(__name__).trace('that worked')
>>> logging.trace('so did this')
>>> logging.TRACE
5
"""
if not methodName:
methodName = levelName.lower()
if hasattr(logging, levelName):
raise AttributeError('{} already defined in logging module'.format(levelName))
if hasattr(logging, methodName):
raise AttributeError('{} already defined in logging module'.format(methodName))
if hasattr(logging.getLoggerClass(), methodName):
raise AttributeError('{} already defined in logger class'.format(methodName))
# This method was inspired by the answers to Stack Overflow post
# http://stackoverflow.com/q/2183233/2988730, especially
# http://stackoverflow.com/a/13638084/2988730
def logForLevel(self, message, *args, **kwargs):
if self.isEnabledFor(levelNum):
self._log(levelNum, message, args, **kwargs)
def logToRoot(message, *args, **kwargs):
logging.log(levelNum, message, *args, **kwargs)
logging.addLevelName(levelNum, levelName)
setattr(logging, levelName, levelNum)
setattr(logging.getLoggerClass(), methodName, logForLevel)
setattr(logging, methodName, logToRoot)
You can find an even more detailed implementation in the utility library I maintain, haggis. The function haggis.logs.add_logging_level
is a more production-ready implementation of this answer.
Upvotes: 181
Reputation: 2641
To people reading in 2022 and beyond: you should probably check out the currently next-highest-rated answer here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/35804945/1691778
My original answer is below.
--
@Eric S.
Eric S.'s answer is excellent, but I learned by experimentation that this will always cause messages logged at the new debug level to be printed -- regardless of what the log level is set to. So if you make a new level number of 9
, if you call setLevel(50)
, the lower level messages will erroneously be printed.
To prevent that from happening, you need another line inside the "debugv" function to check if the logging level in question is actually enabled.
Fixed example that checks if the logging level is enabled:
import logging
DEBUG_LEVELV_NUM = 9
logging.addLevelName(DEBUG_LEVELV_NUM, "DEBUGV")
def debugv(self, message, *args, **kws):
if self.isEnabledFor(DEBUG_LEVELV_NUM):
# Yes, logger takes its '*args' as 'args'.
self._log(DEBUG_LEVELV_NUM, message, args, **kws)
logging.Logger.debugv = debugv
If you look at the code for class Logger
in logging.__init__.py
for Python 2.7, this is what all the standard log functions do (.critical, .debug, etc.).
I apparently can't post replies to others' answers for lack of reputation... hopefully Eric will update his post if he sees this. =)
Upvotes: 241
Reputation: 21
Someone might wanna do, a root level custom logging; and avoid the usage of logging.get_logger(''):
import logging
from datetime import datetime
c_now=datetime.now()
logging.basicConfig(
level=logging.INFO,
format="%(asctime)s [%(levelname)s] :: %(message)s",
handlers=[
logging.StreamHandler(),
logging.FileHandler("../logs/log_file_{}-{}-{}-{}.log".format(c_now.year,c_now.month,c_now.day,c_now.hour))
]
)
DEBUG_LEVELV_NUM = 99
logging.addLevelName(DEBUG_LEVELV_NUM, "CUSTOM")
def custom_level(message, *args, **kws):
logging.Logger._log(logging.root,DEBUG_LEVELV_NUM, message, args, **kws)
logging.custom_level = custom_level
# --- --- --- ---
logging.custom_level("Waka")
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 757
I took the avoid seeing "lambda" answer and had to modify where the log_at_my_log_level
was being added. I too saw the problem that Paul did – I don't think this works. Don't you need logger as the first arg in log_at_my_log_level
? This worked for me
import logging
DEBUG_LEVELV_NUM = 9
logging.addLevelName(DEBUG_LEVELV_NUM, "DEBUGV")
def debugv(self, message, *args, **kws):
# Yes, logger takes its '*args' as 'args'.
self._log(DEBUG_LEVELV_NUM, message, args, **kws)
logging.Logger.debugv = debugv
Upvotes: 74
Reputation: 1831
While we have already plenty of correct answers, the following is in my opinion more pythonic:
import logging
from functools import partial, partialmethod
logging.TRACE = 5
logging.addLevelName(logging.TRACE, 'TRACE')
logging.Logger.trace = partialmethod(logging.Logger.log, logging.TRACE)
logging.trace = partial(logging.log, logging.TRACE)
If you want to use mypy
on your code, it is recommended to add # type: ignore
to suppress warnings from adding attribute.
Upvotes: 34
Reputation: 13
based on pinned answer, i wrote a little method which automaticaly create new logging levels
def set_custom_logging_levels(config={}):
"""
Assign custom levels for logging
config: is a dict, like
{
'EVENT_NAME': EVENT_LEVEL_NUM,
}
EVENT_LEVEL_NUM can't be like already has logging module
logging.DEBUG = 10
logging.INFO = 20
logging.WARNING = 30
logging.ERROR = 40
logging.CRITICAL = 50
"""
assert isinstance(config, dict), "Configuration must be a dict"
def get_level_func(level_name, level_num):
def _blank(self, message, *args, **kws):
if self.isEnabledFor(level_num):
# Yes, logger takes its '*args' as 'args'.
self._log(level_num, message, args, **kws)
_blank.__name__ = level_name.lower()
return _blank
for level_name, level_num in config.items():
logging.addLevelName(level_num, level_name.upper())
setattr(logging.Logger, level_name.lower(), get_level_func(level_name, level_num))
config may smth like that:
new_log_levels = {
# level_num is in logging.INFO section, that's why it 21, 22, etc..
"FOO": 21,
"BAR": 22,
}
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 704
In case anyone wants an automated way to add a new logging level to the logging module (or a copy of it) dynamically, I have created this function, expanding @pfa's answer:
def add_level(log_name,custom_log_module=None,log_num=None,
log_call=None,
lower_than=None, higher_than=None, same_as=None,
verbose=True):
'''
Function to dynamically add a new log level to a given custom logging module.
<custom_log_module>: the logging module. If not provided, then a copy of
<logging> module is used
<log_name>: the logging level name
<log_num>: the logging level num. If not provided, then function checks
<lower_than>,<higher_than> and <same_as>, at the order mentioned.
One of those three parameters must hold a string of an already existent
logging level name.
In case a level is overwritten and <verbose> is True, then a message in WARNING
level of the custom logging module is established.
'''
if custom_log_module is None:
import imp
custom_log_module = imp.load_module('custom_log_module',
*imp.find_module('logging'))
log_name = log_name.upper()
def cust_log(par, message, *args, **kws):
# Yes, logger takes its '*args' as 'args'.
if par.isEnabledFor(log_num):
par._log(log_num, message, args, **kws)
available_level_nums = [key for key in custom_log_module._levelNames
if isinstance(key,int)]
available_levels = {key:custom_log_module._levelNames[key]
for key in custom_log_module._levelNames
if isinstance(key,str)}
if log_num is None:
try:
if lower_than is not None:
log_num = available_levels[lower_than]-1
elif higher_than is not None:
log_num = available_levels[higher_than]+1
elif same_as is not None:
log_num = available_levels[higher_than]
else:
raise Exception('Infomation about the '+
'log_num should be provided')
except KeyError:
raise Exception('Non existent logging level name')
if log_num in available_level_nums and verbose:
custom_log_module.warn('Changing ' +
custom_log_module._levelNames[log_num] +
' to '+log_name)
custom_log_module.addLevelName(log_num, log_name)
if log_call is None:
log_call = log_name.lower()
setattr(custom_log_module.Logger, log_call, cust_log)
return custom_log_module
Upvotes: -3
Reputation: 6330
I'm confused; with python 3.5, at least, it just works:
import logging
TRACE = 5
"""more detail than debug"""
logging.basicConfig()
logging.addLevelName(TRACE,"TRACE")
logger = logging.getLogger('')
logger.debug("n")
logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)
logger.debug("y1")
logger.log(TRACE,"n")
logger.setLevel(TRACE)
logger.log(TRACE,"y2")
output:
DEBUG:root:y1
TRACE:root:y2
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 51
Addition to Mad Physicists example to get file name and line number correct:
def logToRoot(message, *args, **kwargs):
if logging.root.isEnabledFor(levelNum):
logging.root._log(levelNum, message, args, **kwargs)
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 3732
Tips for creating a custom logger:
_log
, use log
(you don't have to check isEnabledFor
)getLogger
, so you will need to set the class via setLoggerClass
__init__
for the logger, class if you are not storing anything# Lower than debug which is 10
TRACE = 5
class MyLogger(logging.Logger):
def trace(self, msg, *args, **kwargs):
self.log(TRACE, msg, *args, **kwargs)
When calling this logger use setLoggerClass(MyLogger)
to make this the default logger from getLogger
logging.setLoggerClass(MyLogger)
log = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# ...
log.trace("something specific")
You will need to setFormatter
, setHandler
, and setLevel(TRACE)
on the handler
and on the log
itself to actually se this low level trace
Upvotes: 7
Reputation: 1011
This question is rather old, but I just dealt with the same topic and found a way similiar to those already mentioned which appears a little cleaner to me. This was tested on 3.4, so I'm not sure whether the methods used exist in older versions:
from logging import getLoggerClass, addLevelName, setLoggerClass, NOTSET
VERBOSE = 5
class MyLogger(getLoggerClass()):
def __init__(self, name, level=NOTSET):
super().__init__(name, level)
addLevelName(VERBOSE, "VERBOSE")
def verbose(self, msg, *args, **kwargs):
if self.isEnabledFor(VERBOSE):
self._log(VERBOSE, msg, args, **kwargs)
setLoggerClass(MyLogger)
Upvotes: 52
Reputation: 9511
As alternative to adding an extra method to the Logger class I would recommend using the Logger.log(level, msg)
method.
import logging
TRACE = 5
logging.addLevelName(TRACE, 'TRACE')
FORMAT = '%(levelname)s:%(name)s:%(lineno)d:%(message)s'
logging.basicConfig(format=FORMAT)
l = logging.getLogger()
l.setLevel(TRACE)
l.log(TRACE, 'trace message')
l.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)
l.log(TRACE, 'disabled trace message')
Upvotes: 4
Reputation: 9511
Who started the bad practice of using internal methods (self._log
) and why is each answer based on that?! The pythonic solution would be to use self.log
instead so you don't have to mess with any internal stuff:
import logging
SUBDEBUG = 5
logging.addLevelName(SUBDEBUG, 'SUBDEBUG')
def subdebug(self, message, *args, **kws):
self.log(SUBDEBUG, message, *args, **kws)
logging.Logger.subdebug = subdebug
logging.basicConfig()
l = logging.getLogger()
l.setLevel(SUBDEBUG)
l.subdebug('test')
l.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)
l.subdebug('test')
Upvotes: 20
Reputation: 31910
This worked for me:
import logging
logging.basicConfig(
format=' %(levelname)-8.8s %(funcName)s: %(message)s',
)
logging.NOTE = 32 # positive yet important
logging.addLevelName(logging.NOTE, 'NOTE') # new level
logging.addLevelName(logging.CRITICAL, 'FATAL') # rename existing
log = logging.getLogger(__name__)
log.note = lambda msg, *args: log._log(logging.NOTE, msg, args)
log.note('school\'s out for summer! %s', 'dude')
log.fatal('file not found.')
The lambda/funcName issue is fixed with logger._log as @marqueed pointed out. I think using lambda looks a bit cleaner, but the drawback is that it can't take keyword arguments. I've never used that myself, so no biggie.
NOTE setup: school's out for summer! dude FATAL setup: file not found.
Upvotes: 5
Reputation: 1123
In my experience, this is the full solution the the op's problem... to avoid seeing "lambda" as the function in which the message is emitted, go deeper:
MY_LEVEL_NUM = 25
logging.addLevelName(MY_LEVEL_NUM, "MY_LEVEL_NAME")
def log_at_my_log_level(self, message, *args, **kws):
# Yes, logger takes its '*args' as 'args'.
self._log(MY_LEVEL_NUM, message, args, **kws)
logger.log_at_my_log_level = log_at_my_log_level
I've never tried working with a standalone logger class, but I think the basic idea is the same (use _log).
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 506
I find it easier to create a new attribute for the logger object that passes the log() function. I think the logger module provides the addLevelName() and the log() for this very reason. Thus no subclasses or new method needed.
import logging
@property
def log(obj):
logging.addLevelName(5, 'TRACE')
myLogger = logging.getLogger(obj.__class__.__name__)
setattr(myLogger, 'trace', lambda *args: myLogger.log(5, *args))
return myLogger
now
mylogger.trace('This is a trace message')
should work as expected.
Upvotes: 8
Reputation: 72795
I think you'll have to subclass the Logger
class and add a method called trace
which basically calls Logger.log
with a level lower than DEBUG
. I haven't tried this but this is what the docs indicate.
Upvotes: 9