stuartdotnet
stuartdotnet

Reputation: 3034

The model backing the '--Context' context has changed since the database was created - but db is new production database

I've got this error for the 762nd time but this time I am getting it as soon as I attempt to access my Production site, straight after deleting the 'production' database on Azure and then publishing my site.

The model backing the 'PropertyContext' context has changed since the database was created. Consider using Code First Migrations to update the database

I deleted the database because I couldn't fix this issue any other way but it still doesn't work.

Some important points:

and

Database.SetInitializer(new MigrateDatabaseToLatestVersion<PropertyContext, MyConfiguration>());
new PropertyContext().Database.Initialize(true);

I'm using .net 4.5

Why am I getting this error on a new database and how can I get this site to work?

Upvotes: 25

Views: 50936

Answers (6)

Alisson Reinaldo Silva
Alisson Reinaldo Silva

Reputation: 10695

I have spent some hours trying to solve this problem. One project was working, the other one wasn't.

I had different projects referencing different versions of Entity Framework. In my case, I had a Console app and a Windows Service app, both referencing a third project containing code first classes and DbContext.

After running Update-Package EntityFramework everything worked fine in both projects.

Upvotes: 0

saka saka
saka saka

Reputation: 11

Got a similar problem! Answer is here http://www.asp.net/mvc/overview/older-versions/getting-started-with-aspnet-mvc3/cs/adding-a-new-field

(Rick Anderson) There are two approaches to resolving the error:

  1. Have the Entity Framework automatically drop and re-create the database based on the new model class schema. This approach is very convenient when doing active development on a test database, because it allows you to quickly evolve the model and database schema together. The downside, though, is that you lose existing data in the database — so you don't want to use this approach on a production database!

  2. Explicitly modify the schema of the existing database so that it matches the model classes. The advantage of this approach is that you keep your data. You can make this change either manually or by creating a database change script.

Upvotes: 1

Talon
Talon

Reputation: 3593

When using Code First with Migrations, your database creates a table called __MigrationHistory to track the current schema. When you run your application your Entity Framework will check this table to make sure that the database schema matches your database entities. If they do not match, you will get this error.

To update your database follow these steps:

  1. Open the Package Manager Console (View -> Other Windows -> Package Manager Console) in Visual Studio
  2. In the Package Manager Console Window, there is a drop down with your projects in, make sure it is set to the project that contains your DbContext
  3. Make sure that the project that contains your App.Config / Web.Config file is "Set as Startup Project" (If you have multiple Configs, it must be the one with the Database Connection String defined.
  4. Type Update-Database -ConnectionStringName MyConnString where MyConnString is the name (not the actual connection string) of your connection string in your App.Config / Web.Config

If you get an error like this: "Unable to update database to match the current model because there are pending changes and automatic migration is disabled."

You should enable Automatic Migrations and try again. To enable Automatic Migrations

  1. In the Migrations folder (in the project with your DbContext), open Configuration.cs.
  2. Make sure the Constructor contains: AutomaticMigrationsEnabled = true;

To stop Entity Framework/DbContext from monitoring changes on your database you could simply delete the __MigrationHistory table in your database. It is then up to you to make sure that the database remains updated manually.

MSDN article here

Upvotes: 27

seva titov
seva titov

Reputation: 11920

Just ran into the same error in ASP.Net application. In my case I did not use Code First, but I used standard ASP.Net authentication provider which apparently uses Code First, and authentication was broken because of this issue.

Here is quick and dirty solution is you don't care much about existing user records:

For me the solution was to drop the dbo.__MigrationHistory table, authentication started working fine after that. Be aware! This solution is not for everyone! This will fix the problem, but it is potentially risky.

If you cannot afford to lose data in AspNet* tables:

ASP.Net authentication provider automatically creates tables in your database:

  • AspNetRoles
  • AspNetUsers
  • AspNetUserRoles
  • AspNetUserClaims
  • AspNetUserLogings

The tables are empty by default, if you haven't created any new logins for your web site, you can use "quick and dirty" solution above. If you do care about preserving user information or just curios how Code First migrations work, follow these steps:

  • Open your Web.config file and check the name of the connection string you have for your database. It will be one of the records under <connectionStrings> element.
  • Open Package Manager Console:

    Tools –> Library Package Manager –> Package Manager Console

  • In Package Manager Console window, use a drop-down to set Default Project. Make sure this is the project that contains ASP.Net authentication provider code.
  • Execute command:
    Update-Database -ConnectionStringName MyConnectionStringName

Replace the MyConnectionStringName with the actual name you looked up in web.config.

As a result of this command you will see a new folder "Migrations" with a bunch of code generated by the Update-Database command. Re-build and re-deploy your app, your new migration code will be executed on startup and would bring the database schema in sync with an updated version of ASP.Net authentication provider code.

Upvotes: 37

Mhadonis
Mhadonis

Reputation: 340

The solution from this is to use the static method SetInitializer and bind to the context a Null value. If you are working on a Web solution, the best position to write the code is in the Application_Start of your Global.asax.cs file.

protected void Application_Start() 
{
    AreaRegistration.RegisterAllAreas();
    RegisterRoutes(RouteTable.Routes);
    //...
    Database.SetInitializer<MyContext>(null);
}

Upvotes: 7

Ohlin
Ohlin

Reputation: 4178

I got a similar problem this morning. Suddenly the error appeared and couldn't be resolved:

The model backing the 'ApplicationDbContext' context has changed since 
the database was created. Consider using Code First Migrations to update 
the database

I have one project for MVC and another project for the model, context and repositories. I've been working on it for weeks but today it said stop.

I have tried to delete database, enable-migration, add-migration and update-database so many times that I've lost count. I've added initializers to MigrateDatabaseToLatestVersion as well as DropCreateDatabaseIfModelChanges. All in vain...

What finally made it work was to move model, context and repositories into the MVC project (not something I was keen on)...then it worked right out of the box without any code changes at all (besides namespaces)! Very strange...

I've read so many blog posts during the day trying to solve this problem. One of them (I don't know which one) mentioned a bug in Visual Studio 2013 where reference to DLL files weren't always updated as they should, suggesting that my MVC project missed out something when I was running add-migration and update-database in my separate project. But it's just a guess.

I'm using EF 6.1 and .Net 4.5.1 in my solution.

Upvotes: 3

Related Questions