Simon_Weaver
Simon_Weaver

Reputation: 145880

is a query string with a / in it valid?

Due to a miscommunication with an affiliate partner we're working with the URL they call on our server has been mixed up.

This is the URL they are supposed to call on our server :

 /AAAAAAAA/?b=CCCCCCC

unfotunately it was implemented in their system as this

 ?b=CCCCCCC/AAAAAAA

I can easily parse out the components, but I'm worried that a query string parameter with / in it is not actually a valid URL.

Is a / in a URL actually valid - or should I be concerned. Under what circumstances may an unencoded / cause problems in a query string.

Upvotes: 9

Views: 1269

Answers (3)

KajMagnus
KajMagnus

Reputation: 11666

According to RFC 3986: Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax (from year 2005), yes, / is allowed in the query component. This is the BNF for the query string: (in Appendix A in RFC 3986)

query         = *( pchar / "/" / "?" )
pchar         = unreserved / pct-encoded / sub-delims / ":" / "@"

The spec says:

  • The characters slash ("/") and question mark ("?") may represent data within the query component.
  • as query components are often used to carry identifying information in the form of "key=value" pairs and one frequently used value is a reference to another URI, it is sometimes better for usability to avoid percent-encoding those characters

Here is a related question: Query string: Can a query string contain a URL that also contains query strings?

Upvotes: 12

hobbs
hobbs

Reputation: 239682

Slash is a "reserved character" in the query part of a URL per RFC 2396 section 3.4, so according to section 2.2 it has to be encoded. That is, a query part can contain %2F but shouldn't contain /.

Upvotes: 1

Nick Craver
Nick Craver

Reputation: 630349

Although I've never had a problem, they're not technically allowed as per RFC 2396:

Within a query component, the characters ";", "/", "?", ":", "@", "&", "=", "+", ",", and "$" are reserved.

But as I said...I've never run into any issues. I think it's a problem with older browsers more than anything, but maybe someone can shed some more light on a problem this causes?

Upvotes: 2

Related Questions