Reputation: 134664
So I'm looking into the feasibility of changing from callback interfaces to local broadcasts for some long-running network operations. Since the Activity lifecycle creates all sorts of complication for asynchronous requests that need to modify the UI (disconnect the Activity from the callback in onDestroy()
, don't modify FragmentTransaction
s after onSaveInstanceState()
, etc.), I'm thinking that using local broadcasts makes more sense, and we can just register/unregister the receiver at the lifecycle events.
However, when the Activity is destroyed and recreated during a configuration change, there's this small window of time when the broadcast receiver would not be registered (in between onPause()/onResume()
for example). So if, for example, we start an asynchronous request in onCreate()
if savedInstanceState == null
(e.g. for the first launch of the Activity), isn't it possible that the broadcast sent upon completion would be lost if the user changes their device orientation right before the operation completes? (i.e. the receiver is unregistered on onPause(), then the operation completes, then the receiver is re-registered in onResume())
If that's the case, then it adds a lot of extra complexity we would need to add support for, and it's probably not worth the switch. I've looked into other things such as the Otto EventBus library but I'm not sure whether or not it has the same concerns to worry about.
Upvotes: 5
Views: 3099
Reputation: 608
I found android loaders is extremly helpful in this case.
In my case I need to receive broadcasts from another application and manage fragment transitions in my application.
So i did like below.
/**
* LoaderManager callbacks
*/
private LoaderManager.LoaderCallbacks<Intent> mLoaderCallbacks =
new LoaderManager.LoaderCallbacks<Intent>() {
@Override
public Loader<Intent> onCreateLoader(int id, Bundle args) {
Logger.v(SUB_TAG + " onCreateLoader");
return new MyLoader(MyActivity.this);
}
@Override
public void onLoadFinished(Loader<Intent> loader, Intent intent) {
Logger.i(SUB_TAG + " onLoadFinished");
// Display our data
if (intent.getAction().equals(INTENT_CHANGE_SCREEN)) {
if (false == isFinishing()) {
// handle fragment transaction
handleChangeScreen(intent.getExtras());
}
} else if (intent.getAction().equals(INTENT_CLOSE_SCREEN)) {
finishActivity();
}
}
@Override
public void onLoaderReset(Loader<Intent> loader) {
Logger.i(SUB_TAG + " onLoaderReset");
}
};
/**
* Listening to change screen commands. We use Loader here because
* it works well with activity life cycle.
* eg, like when the activity is paused and we receive command, it
* will be delivered to activity only after activity comes back.
* LoaderManager handles this.
*/
private static class MyLoader extends Loader<Intent> {
private Intent mIntent;
BroadcastReceiver mCommadListner;
public MyLoader(Context context) {
super(context);
Logger.i(SUB_TAG + " MyLoader");
}
private void registerMyListner() {
if (mCommadListner != null) {
return;
}
Logger.i(SUB_TAG + " registerMyListner");
mCommadListner = new BroadcastReceiver() {
@Override
public void onReceive(Context context, Intent intent) {
String action = intent.getAction();
if (action == null || action.isEmpty()) {
Logger.i(SUB_TAG + " intent action null/empty returning: ");
return;
}
Logger.i(SUB_TAG + " intent action: " + action);
mIntent = intent;
deliverResult(mIntent);
}
};
IntentFilter filter = new IntentFilter();
filter.addAction(INTENT_CHANGE_SCREEN);
getContext().registerReceiver(mCommadListner, filter);
}
@Override
protected void onStartLoading() {
Logger.i(SUB_TAG + " onStartLoading");
if (mIntent != null) {
deliverResult(mIntent);
}
registerMyListner();
}
@Override
protected void onReset() {
Logger.i(SUB_TAG + "Loader onReset");
if (mCommadListner != null) {
getContext().unregisterReceiver(mCommadListner);
mCommadListner = null;
}
}
}
Activity#onCreate or Fragment@onActivityCreated()
@Override
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
// Listening to change screen commands from broadcast listner. We use Loader here because
// it works well with activity life cycle.
// eg, like when the activity is paused and we receive intent from broadcast, it will delivered
// to activity only after activity comes back. LoaderManager handles this.
getLoaderManager().initLoader(0, null, mLoaderCallbacks);
}
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 3070
As documented in the onRetainNonConfigurationInstance()
method of the Activity
, the system disables the message queue processing in the main thread while the Activity
is in the process of being restarted. This ensures that events posted to the main thread will always be delivered at a stable point in the lifecycle of the Activity
.
However, there seems to be a design flaw in the sendBroadcast()
method of LocalBroadcastManager
, in that it evaluates the registered BroadcastReceiver
s from the posting thread before queuing the broadcast to be delivered on the main thread, instead of evaluating them on the main thread at the time of broadcast delivery. While this enables it to report the success or failure of the delivery, it does not provide the proper semantics to allow BroadcastReceiver
s to be safely unregistered temporarily from the main thread without the possibility of losing potential broadcasts.
The solution to this is to use a Handler
to post the broadcasts from the main thread, using the sendBroadcastSync()
method so that the broadcasts are delivered immediately instead of being reposted. Here's a sample utility class implementing this:
public class LocalBroadcastUtils extends Handler {
private final LocalBroadcastManager manager;
private LocalBroadcastUtils(Context context) {
super(context.getMainLooper());
manager = LocalBroadcastManager.getInstance(context);
}
@Override
public void handleMessage(Message msg) {
manager.sendBroadcastSync((Intent) msg.obj);
}
private static LocalBroadcastUtils instance;
public static void sendBroadcast(Context context, Intent intent) {
if (Looper.myLooper() == context.getMainLooper()) {
// If this is called from the main thread, we can retain the
// "optimization" provided by the LocalBroadcastManager semantics.
// Or we could just revert to evaluating matching BroadcastReceivers
// at the time of delivery consistently for all cases.
LocalBroadcastManager.getInstance(context).sendBroadcast(intent);
} else {
synchronized (LocalBroadcastUtils.class) {
if (instance == null) {
instance = new LocalBroadcastUtils(context);
}
}
instance.sendMessage(instance.obtainMessage(0, intent));
}
}
}
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 20416
To overcome this issue you need a component which stays alive even when activity gets re-created on configuration change. You can either use Application singleton or a retained Fragment.
If you use Otto or EventBus, then you can create an instance of event bus as a field of Application, and it will stay decoupled from device configuration changes like orientation change. Your activity will need to register event listener in onStart()
and it will receive latest events.
If you use a retained Fragment, then fragment will stay alive until activity is not finished. Configuration changes will not release the instance of retained fragment either. It is also good practice to make retained Fragment invisible (return null
from onCreateView()
method). In onStart()
of your activity you can always puck up latest state from that Fragment.
You can use LocalBroadcastManager with one of these approaches, but it doesn't really addresses the issue. It's just like any other event bus, but with ugly and inconvenient API ;)
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 6598
Normal broadcast will be lost if your activity will be paused or recreated. You can use sticky broadcast but it doesn't work with LocalBroadcastManager
and you have to remember to manually remove sticky broadcast by calling Context.removeStickyBroadcast()
. Sticky broadcast will be kept by system(even if your activity is paused) until you decide to delete it.
EventBus offer postSticky() method which works similar to sticky broadcast.
Upvotes: 0