Reputation: 2097
I have class
Class A{
};
typedef struct
{
const char *dec_text;
void (A::*TestFun)();
} Test ;
Test _funs[] = {{"testLogOK", &A::testLogOK},
{"testLoginException", &A::testLoginException}
};;
How can i initialize this Test Array in construct method. The _funs tracks the A's method name and corresponding address, the methods which like:
void (methodName) (void)
In construction method, both below ways fail:
_funs = {{"testLogOK", &A::testLogOK},
{"testLoginException", &A::testLoginException}
};
The other question is how can i invoke the function pointer.. I tried the way like:
int
A::run (const char *name, int argc, ACE_TCHAR *argv[])
{
for(int i=0; i< sizeof(_funs)/sizeof(Test); i++){
Test test = _funs[i];
*(test.testFun)(); //this->*(test.fun)(); Both fail with same error
//(this->*(test.fun))() works
}
}
The compile also fails with message:
error C2064: term does not evaluate to a function taking 0 arguments
[UPdate]
I removed the struct Test and Test _funs out of Class A. But still have problem in A's method:
int A::run (const char *name, int argc, ACE_TCHAR *argv[])
The testLogOK and testLoginException method do exist as member functions of class A
Upvotes: 1
Views: 1679
Reputation: 2395
Try this:
class A
{
public:
struct Test
{
const char *dec_text;
void (A::*TestFun)();
};
A(Test tt[])
{
for (int i=0; tt[i].dec_text; i++)
_funs[i] = tt[i];
}
void f1() { printf("this is f1\n"); }
void f2() { printf("this is f2\n"); }
void f3() { printf("this is f3\n"); }
Test _funs[100];
};
A::Test tt[] =
{
{ "Function f1", &A::f1},
{ "Function f2", &A::f2},
{ "Function f3", &A::f3},
{0, 0}
};
void test()
{
A a(tt);
(a.*(a._funs[0].TestFun))();
A *pa = new A(tt);
(pa->*(pa->_funs[1].TestFun))();
delete pa;
// EDIT: call f3
(a.*(tt[2].TestFun))(); // this will call directly from the global table
}
This will invoke the function assigned to the pointer. This can be improved quite a bit if you typedef the pointer to the member
typedef void (A::*PF_T)();
and use a std::map as container:
std::map<std::string, PF_T> func_map;
It can be streamlined a lot more, but I hope it helps up to this point.
Upvotes: 2