Reputation: 1920
I am trying to map a A-DTO object to an A-DO object, each having a collection (a List) of T-DTOs, and T-DOs, respectively. I am trying to do it in the context of a REST API. It's a separate question whether it's a right approach - the problem I'm solving is a case of update. Basically, if one of the T-DTOs inside the A-DTO changes, I want that change to be mapped into the corresponding T-DO inside the A-DO.
I found relationship-type="non-cumulative"
in Dozer documentation, so that the object inside the collection is updated, if present. But I end up with Dozer inserting a new T-DO into the A-DO's collection!
NOTE: I did implement equals
! it is based on the primary key only for now.
Any ideas?
PS: and, if you think this is a bad idea to handle updates to a one-to-many dependent entity, feel free to point that out.. I'm not 100% sure I like that approach, but my REST foo is not very strong.
UPDATE
equals
implementation:
@Override
public boolean equals(Object obj) {
if (obj instanceof MyDOClass) {
MyDOClass other = (MyDOClass) obj;
return other.getId().equals(this.getId());
}
return false;
}
Upvotes: 2
Views: 2859
Reputation: 1
I did endup doing my own AbstractConverter please find it below: It has some constraints which are suitable for me (possibly not for you).
Sample use
public class MyConverter extends AbstractListConverter<ClassX,ClassY>{
public MyConverter(){ super(ClassX.class, ClassY.class);}
@Override
protected boolean sameId(ClassX o1, ClassY o2) {
return // your custom comparison here... true means the o2 and o1 can update each other.
}
}
Declaration in mapper.xml
<mapping>
<class-a>x.y.z.AClass</class-a>
<class-b>a.b.c.AnotherClass</class-b>
<field custom-converter="g.e.MyConverter">
<a>ListField</a>
<b>OtherListField</b>
</field>
</mapping>
public abstract class AbstractListConverter<A, B> implements MapperAware, CustomConverter {
private Mapper mapper;
private Class<A> prototypeA;
private Class<B> prototypeB;
@Override
public void setMapper(Mapper mapper) {
this.mapper = mapper;
}
AbstractListConverter(Class<A> prototypeA, Class<B> prototypeB) {
this.prototypeA = prototypeA;
this.prototypeB = prototypeB;
}
@Override
public Object convert(Object destination, Object source, Class<?> destinationClass, Class<?> sourceClass) {
if (destinationClass == null || sourceClass == null || source == null) {
return null;
}
if (List.class.isAssignableFrom(sourceClass) && List.class.isAssignableFrom(destinationClass)) {
if (destination == null || ((List) destination).size() == 0) {
return produceNewList((List) source, destinationClass);
}
return mergeList((List) source, (List) destination, destinationClass);
}
throw new Error("This specific mapper is only to be used when both source and destination are of type java.util.List");
}
private boolean same(Object o1, Object o2) {
if (prototypeA.isAssignableFrom(o1.getClass()) && prototypeB.isAssignableFrom(o2.getClass())) {
return sameId((A) o1, (B) o2);
}
if (prototypeB.isAssignableFrom(o1.getClass()) && prototypeA.isAssignableFrom(o2.getClass())) {
return sameId((A) o2, (B) o1);
}
return false;
}
abstract protected boolean sameId(A o, B t);
private List mergeList(List source, List destination, Class<?> destinationClass) {
return (List)
source.stream().map(from -> {
Optional to = destination.stream().filter(search -> same(from, search)).findFirst();
if (to.isPresent()) {
Object ret = to.get();
mapper.map(from, ret);
return ret;
} else {
return create(from);
}
}
).collect(Collectors.toList());
}
private List produceNewList(List source, Class<?> destinationClass) {
if (source.size() == 0) return source;
return (List) source.stream().map(o -> create(o)).collect(Collectors.toList());
}
private Object create(Object o) {
if (prototypeA.isAssignableFrom(o.getClass())) {
return mapper.map(o, prototypeB);
}
if (prototypeB.isAssignableFrom(o.getClass())) {
return mapper.map(o, prototypeA);
}
return null;
}
}
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 4158
I just had the same problem and I solved it:
Dozer uses contains
to determine if a member is inside a collection.
You should implement hashCode
so that "contains"
will work appropriately.
You can see this in the following documentation page: http://dozer.sourceforge.net/documentation/collectionandarraymapping.html Under: "Cumulative vs. Non-Cumulative List Mapping (bi-directional)"
Good luck!
Upvotes: 4