Reputation: 1127
The function takes in an integer N. The function must print all prime numbers from 2 to N (including N, if N is itself a prime number).
I have the function and it runs, but it is skipping some prime numbers and even including some even numbers like 8. I can't seem to find the bug that is causing this.
Here's what my code looks like:
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.List;
public class PrimeNumbers {
List <Integer> primeList = new ArrayList<Integer>();
public ArrayList<Integer> findPrimes(int n){
if(n == 2){
primeList.add(n);
}
else{
//should I have i=i+2 instead of i++ to move faster?
//If so, by doing this, it causes weird and different
//output when running
for(int i=2; i<=n; i++){
if(n%i != 0){
primeList.add(i);
}
}
}
return (ArrayList<Integer>) primeList;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
PrimeNumbers pn = new PrimeNumbers();
System.out.println(pn.findPrimes(15));
}
}
Upvotes: 3
Views: 2088
Reputation: 3644
Your logic for finding prime numbers is incorrect.
Right now, what your code does is: 1. Iterate on all the integers up to N 2. Find any integer that N can't be divided by, and add them to the list. This has nothing to do with prime numbers.
Instead, your code should do something like: 1. Iterate on all the integers up to N 2. For each of these integers (let's say M), run a sub-loop iterating on all integers below it, and checking if none of those integers can divide M. If the sub-loop finishes without finding a divider of M, add M to the list - it's a prime number (can't be divided by any integer except 1 and itself).
Simple code for checking if a number (2 or above) is prime:
public boolean isPrime(int num)
{
for (int i = 2; i < num; ++i)
{
if (num % i == 0)
{
return false;
}
}
return true;
}
There are many optimisations for this and it's a world by itself.
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 13483
All you've done is find the not factors of n
. You test if each number leading up to it is a factor of n
by adding it if n % i != 0
.
What you need to do is iterate from 2 to n, and for each of those numbers, test if it's prime. You will need two loops. I suggest creating a method to determine prime numbers, and I guess your current method is find as it is. Just replace if (n % i != 0)
with if(isPrime(i))
public static boolean isPrime(long n) {
// eliminate the simple cases
if (n < 2) {
return false;
} else if (n == 2) {
return true;
}
// only test up until the square root of that number
for (int i = 2; i < Math.pow(n, 0.5) + 1; i++) {
if (n % i == 0) {
return false; // found a factor, it's not prime
}
}
return true; // hasn't found a factor and returned false, so it's prime
}
And then in your current code:
for(int i=2; i<=n; i++){
if(n%i != 0){
primeList.add(i);
}
}
Just change if(n%i != 0){
to if(isPrime(i))
So it would be this:
for(int i=2; i<=n; i++){
if(isPrime(i)) {
primeList.add(i);
}
}
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 360762
Your logic is entirely backwards. You can only say a number is prime if you've tested ALL possible divisors. You're currently adding ANY number which has a non-zero remainder, which is BACKWARDS. A non-zero remainder means it was NOT evenly divisible, meaning it's NOT a multiple of the factor you're testing, e.g.
8 % 3 -> 2
2 != 0 -> true
therefore 8 is prime
You can only do your .add()
call AFTER you've finished the loop and no tests came back true:
is_prime = true; // assume prime
for(i = 2; i <= n; i++) {
if (n % 2 == 0) { // no remainder, even divisible, therefore NOT primt
is_prime = false;
break; // abort the loop, no point in testing more
}
}
And yes, you can boost efficiency somewhat by starting your tests at 3 and jumping by 2. Since 2
is the only even prime, it is literally impossible for any OTHER even number to be prime, because 2 is a divisor of all even numbers. So test 3,5,7,9,etc...
e.g.
test if `n` is even and `!= 2` - if so, then it's NOT prime
run 3,5,7,... loop to test everything else
Upvotes: 2