Reputation: 8556
EDITED per Michal Charemza post.
I have a service that represents angularui modal dialog:
app.factory("dialogFactory", function($modal, $window, $q) {
function confirmDeleteDialog() {
var modalInstance = $modal.open({
templateUrl: "../application/factories/confirmDeleteDialog.htm",
controller: function($scope, $modalInstance) {
$scope.ok = function() {
$modalInstance.close("true");
};
$scope.cancel = function() {
$modalInstance.dismiss("false");
};
}
});
return modalInstance.result.then(function(response) {
return 'My other success result';
}, function(response) {
return $q.reject('My other failure reason');
});
};
return {
confirmDeleteDialog: confirmDeleteDialog
};
});
On calling the delete method if the user has clicked Ok from the dialog requestNotificationChannel.deleteMessage(id)
is executed.
$scope.deleteMessage = function(id) {
var result = dialogFactory.confirmDeleteDialog();
result.then(function(response) {
requestNotificationChannel.deleteMessage(id);
});
};
The problem is I am not able to unit test this.
This is my test. I have correctly injected the q service but I am not sure what should I return from "confirmDeleteDialog"
spy...
describe("has a delete method that should call delete message notification", function() {
var deferred = $q.defer();
spyOn(dialogFactory, "confirmDeleteDialog").and.returnValue(deferred.promise);
spyOn(requestNotificationChannel, "deleteMessage");
$scope.deleteMessage(5);
deferred.resolve();
it("delete message notification is called", function() {
expect(requestNotificationChannel.deleteMessage).toHaveBeenCalled();
});
});
But I am receiving expected spy deleteMessage to have been called
. Which means that the result.then
... part is not executed. What am I missing ?
Upvotes: 26
Views: 28995
Reputation: 27062
To mock a function that returns a promise, it will need to also return a promise, which then needs to be resolved as a separate step.
In your case the deferred.resolve()
you pass to the spy needs to be replaced with deferred.promise
, and the deferred.resolve() performed separately.
beforeEach(function() {
var deferred = $q.defer();
spyOn(dialogFactory, "confirmDeleteDialog").and.returnValue(deferred.promise);
spyOn(requestNotificationChannel, "deleteMessage");
$scope.deleteMessage(5);
deferred.resolve();
$rootScope.$digest();
});
it("delete message notification is called", function() {
expect(requestNotificationChannel.deleteMessage).toHaveBeenCalled();
});
I suspect you also need to call $rootScope.$digest()
, as Angular's promise implementation is tied to the digest loop.
Also, slightly unrelated to your question, but I don't think you need to create your own deferred object in confirmDeleteDialog
. The (anti) pattern you're using has been labelled 'The Forgotten Promise', as in http://taoofcode.net/promise-anti-patterns/
When is simpler, uses less code, and I think that allows better error handling, you can just return the promise that the $modal
service creates:
var modalInstance = $modal.open({...});
return modalInstance.result;
If you want to modify what the calling function sees, in terms of resolved/rejected values, you can create a chained promise by returning the result of then
:
var modalInstance = $modal.open({...});
return modalInstance.result.then(function(successResult) {
return 'My other success result';
}, function(failureReason) {
return $q.reject('My other failure reason');
});
You would usually want to do this if you don't want to expose the inner-workings of a function to its caller. This is analogous to the concept of re-throwing an exception in synchronous programming.
Upvotes: 40