Reputation: 1396
This is a pretty common problem but I haven't yet found the exact question and answer I'm looking for.
I have one table that has a FK pointing to its own PK, to enable an arbitrarily deep hierarchy, like the classic tblEmployee that has a column Manager
that is a FK with the PK tblEmployee.EmployeeID.
Let's say in my app, the user
tblEmployee.Manager
is NULL for those two records.tblEmployee
.Now the table is in a circular reference instead of a proper tree.
What is the best way to make sure that Step 3 cannot be done in an application? I just need to make sure that it will refuse to do that last SQL update, and instead show some error message.
I'm not picky about whether it's a database constraint in SQL Server (has to work in 2008 or 2012) or with some kind of validation routine in the business logic layer of my C# app.
Upvotes: 16
Views: 5130
Reputation: 56769
You can do this with a CHECK CONSTRAINT
that validates manager id is not a cycle. You can't have complex queries in a check constraint, but if you wrap it in a function first you can:
create function CheckManagerCycle( @managerID int )
returns int
as
begin
declare @cycleExists bit
set @cycleExists = 0
;with cte as (
select E.* from tblEmployee E where ID = @managerID
union all
select E.* from tblEmployee E join cte on cte.ManagerID = E.ID and E.ID <> @managerID
)
select @cycleExists = count(*) from cte E where E.ManagerID = @managerID
return @cycleExists;
end
Then you can use a constraint like this:
alter table tblEmployee
ADD CONSTRAINT chkManagerRecursive CHECK ( dbo.CheckManagerCycle(ManagerID) = 0 )
This will prevent adding or updating records to create a cycle from any source.
Edit: An important note: check constraints are validated on the columns they reference. I originally coded this to check cycles on the Employee ID, rather than the Manager ID. However, that did not work because it only triggered on changes to the ID column. This version does work because it is triggered any time the ManagerID
changes.
Upvotes: 21
Reputation: 767
You can add 'level' integer column.
Alice and Dave will have level == 0 If You will set manager for employee his (employee) level will be level+1 of his manager.
During update You should check if manager level is smaller than level of employee...
This will be faster than using procedure...
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 34774
You can include a check in your UPDATE
statement:
DECLARE @Employee INT = 2
,@NewManager INT = 4
;WITH cte AS (SELECT *
FROM tblEmployee
WHERE Manager = @Employee
UNION ALL
SELECT a.*
FROM tblEmployee a
JOIN cte b
ON a.manager = b.EmployeeID)
UPDATE a
SET a.Manager = @NewManager
FROM tblEmployee a
WHERE EmployeeID = @Employee
AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT *
FROM cte b
WHERE a.EmployeeID = b.Manager)
Demo: SQL Fiddle
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 1366
I think the best way to do it it's :
Prevent Step 3, use GET_MANAGERS_OF
and GET_EMPLOYEES_OF
function will be use in both :
If the manager X that you are assigning to employee Y it's not employee N-x of Y.
In any case, thoses recursives functions will be usefull in your SQL queries and C# App
FYI, there is a way to handle SQL ERROR TRANSACTION in C# App ("You can do do that because...").
Upvotes: 0