CODEWITHSUNDEEP
c++classinitializationoperator-overloading
Vlad the Impala
Vlad the Impala

Reputation: 15882

Assignment vs Initialization in C++

I thought that constructors control initialization and operator= functions control assignment in C++. So why does this code work?

#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
using namespace std;

class Deg {
    public:
        Deg() {}
        Deg(int a) : d(a) {}        
        void operator()(double a)
        {
            cout << pow(a,d) << endl;
        }

    private:
        int d;
};

int
main(int argc, char **argv) 
{
    Deg d = 2;
    d(5);
    d = 3; /* this shouldn't work, Deg doesn't have an operator= that takes an int */
    d(5);
    return 0;
}

On the third line of the main function, I am assigning an int to an object of class Deg. Since I don't have an operator=(int) function, I thought that this would certainly fail...but instead it calls the Deg(int a) constructor. So do constructors control assignment as well?

Upvotes: 7

Views: 2228

Answers (2)

user123456
user123456

Reputation:

Just to clarify JonM's answer:

For the line d = 3, an assignment operator is involved. 3 is being implicitly converted to a Deg, as JonM said, and then that Deg is assigned to d using the compiler-generated assignment operator (which by default does a member-wise assignment). If you want to prevent assignment, you must declare a private assignment operator (and do not implement it):

//...
private:
    Deg& operator=(const Deg&);
}

Upvotes: 4

JonM
JonM

Reputation: 840

This is what's called implicit type conversion. The compiler will look to see if there's a constructor to directly change from the type you're assigning to the type you're trying to assign, and call it. You can stop it from happening by adding the explicit keyword in front of the constructor you wouldn't like to be implicitly called, like this:

explicit Deg(int a) : d(a) {}

Upvotes: 18

Related Questions