Reputation: 125
In Python, which is the best way (style wise) to allow public access to an object's variables?
There are lots of options I've seen from different languages, I was wondering which of these (if any) is the preferred Python method? These are the options I'm currently torn between:
class X:
variable_a = 0
variable_b = 0
...
def get_variable_a(self):
return self.variable_a
If this is the recommended way, how do you name the methods? (get_variablename(), or just variablename etc?)
What does everyone recommend for this?
thanks!
Lucy
Upvotes: 3
Views: 830
Reputation: 70128
You can use
Getters and setters (Java like)
class SomeClass(object):
...
def get_x(self):
return self._x
def set_x(self, x):
self._x = x
c = SomeClass()
print c.get_x()
c.set_x(10)
Properties (C# like)
class SomeClass(object):
...
def get_x(self):
return self._x
def set_x(self, x):
self._x = x
x = property(get_x, set_x)
c = SomeClass()
print c.x
c.x = 10
I think it is merely a matter of style. Choose the one you like better. Same applies to the naming convention, choose one convention and stick to it.
In any case, data hiding can be done with pseudo-private variables (beginning with two underscores). They cannot be accessed directly, as opposed to the example variables (_x
not starting with two underscores).
Upvotes: -1
Reputation: 22310
There are no "private" variables in Python. Check section 9.6 of this document http://docs.python.org/tutorial/classes.html
There is a convention though, that the users of the class should treat variables with names, starting with underscore to be not touched directly. Still, there is no mechanism which may prevent this.
Same with the mangled names (starting with 2 underscores).
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 54882
Just allow direct access to any variables that you wish to expose as the public API. If you need to change the behavior you can always turn it into a property later on.
Notice that this is orthogonal to information hiding. obj.get_some_implementation_detail()
is no better than obj.some_implementation_detail
.
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 798536
Don't bother using accessors until they're necessary; converting a simple attribute to a property is quick and easy, and doesn't need modification of client code.
When I write a property, I use _get_FOO()
and _set_FOO()
for the accessors, and _FOO
for the attribute itself.
Upvotes: 4