Reputation: 25842
type 'a lazy_node =
| Empty
| Node of 'a * 'a lazy_list
and 'a lazy_list = 'a lazy_node lazy_t
let con x zl = lazy (Node (x,zl))
So there should be two types defined here: 'a lazy_node
and 'a lazy_list
.
I thought that con
's type would be 'a -> 'a lazy_list -> 'a lazy_list
However, actually when I tried it in utop
, it gave con
such a type:
val con : 'a -> 'a lazy_list -> 'a lazy_node lazy_t = <fun>
Why the return type is not 'a lazy_list
? How does OCaml infer in this case?
Upvotes: 2
Views: 121
Reputation: 6379
In your code lazy_list
is not a new type but just an alias for lazy_node lazy_t
. And the Ocaml type inferer only consider real types, not aliases. So it infers the real type and doesn't check if there is an alias for this type.
The alias is used for the argument because Node (x,zl)
implies that zl
has type 'a lazy_list
.
You can add type annotation to enforce the use of the alias:
let con x zl: 'a lazy_list = lazy (Node (x,zl))
Upvotes: 3