CODEWITHSUNDEEP
sqlsql-serversql-server-2005sql-execution-plan
sidereal
sidereal

Reputation: 1120

No query plan for procedure in SQL Server 2005

We have a SQL Server DB with 150-200 stored procs, all of which produce a viewable query plan in sys.dm_exec_query_plan except for one. According to http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms189747.aspx:

Under the following conditions, no Showplan output is returned in the query_plan column of the returned table for sys.dm_exec_query_plan:

  • If the query plan that is specified by using plan_handle has been evicted from the plan cache, the query_plan column of the returned table is null. For example, this condition may occur if there is a time delay between when the plan handle was captured and when it was used with sys.dm_exec_query_plan.
  • Some Transact-SQL statements are not cached, such as bulk operation statements or statements containing string literals larger than 8 KB in size. XML Showplans for such statements cannot be retrieved by using sys.dm_exec_query_plan unless the batch is currently executing because they do not exist in the cache.
  • If a Transact-SQL batch or stored procedure contains a call to a user-defined function or a call to dynamic SQL, for example using EXEC (string), the compiled XML Showplan for the user-defined function is not included in the table returned by sys.dm_exec_query_plan for the batch or stored procedure. Instead, you must make a separate call to sys.dm_exec_query_plan for the plan handle that corresponds to the user-defined function.

And later..

Due to a limitation in the number of nested levels allowed in the xml data type, sys.dm_exec_query_plan cannot return query plans that meet or exceed 128 levels of nested elements.

I'm confident that none of these apply to this procedure. The result never has a query plan, no matter what the timing, so 1 doesn't apply. There are no long string literals or bulk operations, so 2 doesn't apply. There are no user defined functions or dynamic SQL, so 3 doesn't apply. And there's little nesting, so the last doesn't apply. In fact, it's a very simple proc, which I'm including in full (with some table names changed to protect the innocent). Note that the parameter-sniffing shenanigans postdate the problem. It still happens even if I use the parameters directly in the query. Any ideas on why I don't have a viewable query plan for this proc?

ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[spGetThreadComments] 
    @threadId int, 
    @stateCutoff int = 80, 
    @origin varchar(255) = null, 
    @includeComments bit = 1, 
    @count int = 100000
AS

if (@count is null)
begin
    select @count = 100000
end

-- copy parameters to local variables to avoid parameter sniffing
declare @threadIdL int, @stateCutoffL int, @originL varchar(255), @includeCommentsL bit, @countL int
select @threadIdL = @threadId, @stateCutoffL = @stateCutoff, @originL = @origin, @includeCommentsL = @includeComments, @countL = @count

set rowcount @countL

if (@originL = 'Foo')
begin
    select * from FooComments (nolock) where threadId = @threadId and statusCode <= @stateCutoff 
    order by isnull(parentCommentId, commentId), dateCreated
end
else
begin       
    if (@includeCommentsL = 1)
    begin
        select * from Comments (nolock) 
            where threadId = @threadIdL and statusCode <= @stateCutoffL
            order by isnull(parentCommentId, commentId), dateCreated
    end
    else
    begin
        select userId, commentId from Comments (nolock) 
            where threadId = @threadIdL and statusCode <= @stateCutoffL
            order by isnull(parentCommentId, commentId), dateCreated
    end
end

Upvotes: 2

Views: 2233

Answers (2)

Amy B
Amy B

Reputation: 110181

Hmm, perhaps the tables aren't really tables. They could be views or something else.

Upvotes: 2

KM.
KM.

Reputation: 103657

try putting dbo. or whatever the schema is in front of all of the table names, and then check again.

see this article:

http://www.sommarskog.se/dyn-search-2005.html

quote from the article:

As you can see, I refer to all tables in two-part notation. That is, I also specify the schema (which in SQL 7/2000 parlance normally is referred to as owner.) If I would leave out the schema, each user would get his own his own private version of the query plan

Upvotes: 0

Related Questions