Reputation: 51
I new in Mvc and try to write restful api, I use web api type of application, and try to create versioning, In final I would like to have link type like api/v1/values/get, api/v2/values/get. I tried to create folders v1 and v2 in controllers folder , and create there controllers with name ValuesController, but my request doesn't work. I got HTTP 404.0 - Not Found. How I can configure routing or do something to decide this problem?
Upvotes: 2
Views: 1665
Reputation: 4438
If you need API Versioning in ASP.NET Web API, the Asp.Versioning.WebApi (formerly Microsoft.AspNet.WebApi.Versioning) provides a complete solution. You can version any way that you like:
Using the layout provided in the OP, the solution would be:
namespace Api.V1.Controllers
{
[ApiVersion(1.0)]
[RoutePrefix("api/v{version:apiVersion}/values")]
public class ValuesController : ApiController
{
[HttpGet]
[Route]
public IHttpActionResult Get() =>
Ok(new { message = "From V1" });
}
}
namespace Api.V2.Controllers
{
[ApiVersion(2.0)]
[RoutePrefix("api/v{version:apiVersion}/values")]
public class ValuesController : ApiController
{
[HttpGet]
[Route]
public IHttpActionResult Get() =>
Ok(new { message = "From V2" });
}
}
ApiVersion
simply provides metadata to disambiguate routes. Using attributes tends to be the most common approach, but conventions are supported as well. There is even a built-in convention to derive an API version from the namespace .
public void Configuration(HttpConfiguration configuration)
{
// we only need to change the default constraint resolver for services
// that want urls with versioning like: ~/v{apiVersion}/{controller}
var constraintResolver = new DefaultInlineConstraintResolver()
{
ConstraintMap = { ["apiVersion"] = typeof( ApiVersionRouteConstraint ) },
};
// reporting api versions will return the headers
// "api-supported-versions" and "api-deprecated-versions"
configuration.AddApiVersioning(options => options.ReportApiVersions = true);
configuration.MapHttpAttributeRoutes(constraintResolver);
}
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 2002
API versioning through namespace is explained here. Create a new HttpControllerSelector for yourself as described in the blog post and given example, then switch to that selector in your FilterConfig
via:
GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.Services.Replace(typeof(IHttpControllerSelector), new NamespaceHttpControllerSelector(GlobalConfiguration.Configuration));
Then, register your routes:
config.Routes.MapHttpRoute(
name: "VersionedApi",
routeTemplate: "api/{version}/{controller}/{id}",
defaults: new { id = RouteParameter.Optional }
);
config.Routes.MapHttpRoute(
name: "DefaultApi",
routeTemplate: "api/{controller}/{id}",
defaults: new { id = RouteParameter.Optional }
);
In your custom HttpControllerSelector
, if you want to fallback to a default version, then use the following:
string versionName = GetRouteVariable<string>(routeData, "version");
versionName = versionName ?? DefaultVersion;
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 5989
You can use attribute routing to achieve this kind of versioning. For your example it would look similar to the code snippet below
[RoutePrefix("api/v1/values")]
public class ValuesController : ApiController
{
public object Get(int id) { ... }
}
[RoutePrefix("api/v2/values")]
public class NewValuesController : ApiController
{
public object Get(int id) { ... }
}
Edit
Don't forget to enable attribute routing if you have an existing project. Your WebApiConfig should contain the following snippet:
public static class WebApiConfig
{
public static void Register(HttpConfiguration config)
{
// Attribute routing.
config.MapHttpAttributeRoutes();
// Convention-based routing.
config.Routes.MapHttpRoute(
name: "DefaultApi",
routeTemplate: "api/{controller}/{id}",
defaults: new { id = RouteParameter.Optional }
);
}
}
You can delete the MapHttpRoute part if you don't want to use the convention-based configuration.
You should also make sure that your Global.asax contains the following:
protected void Application_Start()
{
// Pass a delegate to the Configure method.
GlobalConfiguration.Configure(WebApiConfig.Register);
}
Upvotes: 3