Reputation: 27
I have a method transpose in class Matice. When i apply this method on my m2.matice i can see during debugging that my matrix is being transposed, but when i print m2 i get the same matrix as before.
public class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Matice m1 = new Matice(5);
m1.matrixFill(0, 5);
m1.matrixPrint();
Matice m2 = new Matice(3);
m2.matrixFill(-5, 10);
m2.matrixPrint();
m2.transpose();
m2.matrixPrint();
}
}
package matice;
/**
*
* @author Adam Rychter
*/
public class Matice {
int[][] matice;
private int n;
public Matice(int n) {
this.n = n;
if(n > 0) {
matice = new int[n][n];
}
}
public void matrixPrint(){
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < n; j++) {
System.out.format("%5d", matice[i][j]);
}
System.out.println("");
}
System.out.println("");
}
public void matrixFill(int a, int b){
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < n; j++) {
matice[i][j] = (int) (Math.random() * (a + b + 1) - a);
}
}
}
public void transpose(){
int tmp;
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < n; j++) {
tmp = matice[i][j];
matice[i][j] = matice[j][i];
matice[j][i] = tmp;
}
}
}
}
Upvotes: 0
Views: 2071
Reputation: 41
public void transpose(){
int tmp;
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
for (int j = i+1; j < n; j++) {
tmp = matice[i][j];
matice[i][j] = matice[j][i];
matice[j][i] = tmp;
}
}
}
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 4283
Like this, maybe:
public void transpose(){
Matice mL = new Matice(n);
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < n; j++) {
mL.matice[i][j] = matice[j][i];
}
}
matice = mL.matice;
}
See alternate, more efficient answer above.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 4283
Note that j goes from i to n, not 1 to n; also note need for two tmp variables.
public void transpose(){
int tmp1, tmp2;
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
for (int j = i; j < n; j++) {
tmp1 = matice[i][j];
tmp2 = matice[j][i];
matice[i][j] = tmp2;
matice[j][i] = tmp1;
}
}
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 1542
Your problem is that you're transposing each element twice ! once when i=row, j=col, and once when i=col, j=row, with the net effect of leaving the matrix as it was. The easiest way I see to fix it is do the swap only if i>j (and then test to make sure :) this is a suggestion, not working code :)
Upvotes: 3