CODEWITHSUNDEEP
htmlcssmedia-queries
user2837485
user2837485

Reputation: 59

website responsive showing good in firefox but not in mobile?

I can't figure out the issue. I searched a lot and after that. I am here for help so guys please help me. Below is the HTML I use:

     <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1, maximum-scale=1,          user-scalable=0">

and these are the media queries 

     @media all and (max-width: 1400px) { }
     @media all and (max-width: 1024px) { }
     @media only screen and (max-width: 768px) { }
     @media only screen and (max-width: 480px) { }
     @media only screen and (max-width: 320px) { }

Help me identify what is wrong.

Upvotes: 0

Views: 392

Answers (2)

4dgaurav
4dgaurav

Reputation: 11506

@media all and (min-width: 1400px) {
}

@media all and (max-width: 1399px) and (min-width: 1024px) {
}

@media all and (max-width: 1023px) and (min-width: 768px) {
}

@media all and (max-width: 767px) and (min-width: 480px) {
}

@media all and (max-width: 479px) and (min-width: 320px) {
}

@media all and (max-width: 319px) {
}

This in <head></head>

  <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, user-scalable=no" /> <-- user-scalable=yes if you want user to allow zoom -->

change you @media style as this // change width as per your requirements

@media only screen (max-width: 500px) {
 // or as per your needs, as I try to explain below
}

Now I try to explain maybe..:)

@media (max-width:500px)

for a window with a max-width of 500px that you want to apply these styles. At that size you would be talking about anything smaller than a desktop screen in most cases. 

@media screen and (max-width:500px)

for a device with a screen and a window with max-width of 500px apply the style. This is almost identical to the above except you are specifying screen as opposed to the other media types the most common other one being print.

@media only screen and (max-width:500px)

Here is a quote straight from W3C to explain this one.

The keyword ‘only’ can also be used to hide style sheets from older user agents. User agents must process media queries starting with ‘only’ as if the ‘only’ keyword was not present.

As there is no such media type as "only", the style sheet should be ignored by older browsers.


I try to put some more information here, gathered from web.

If

That's what media queries are: logical if statements. "If" these things are true about the browser, use the CSS inside.

And

The keyword and.

@media (min-width: 600px) and (max-width: 800px) {
  html { background: red; }
}

Or

Comma separate.

@media (max-width: 600px), (min-width: 800px) {
  html { background: red; }
}

Technically these are treated like to separate media queries, but that is effectively and or.

Not

Reverse the logic with the keyword not.

@media not all and (max-width: 600px) {
  html { background: red; }
}

Just doing not (max-width: 600px) doesn't seem to work for me, hence the slightly funky syntax above. Perhaps someone can explain that to me. Note that not only works for the current media query, so if you comma separate, it only affects the media query it is within. Also note that not reverses the logic for the entire media query as a whole, not individual parts of it. not x and y = not (x and y) ≠ (not x) and y

Exclusive

To ensure that only one media query is in effect at time, make the numbers (or whatever) such that that is possible. It may be easier to mentally manage them this way.

@media (max-width: 400px) {
  html { background: red; }
}
@media (min-width: 401px) and (max-width: 800px) {
  html { background: green; }
}
@media (min-width: 801px) {
  html { background: blue; }
}

Logically this is a bit like a switch statement, only without a simple way to do "if none of these match do this" like default.

Overriding

There is nothing preventing more than one media query from being true at the same time. It may be more efficient to use this in some cases rather than making them all exclusive.

@media (min-width: 400px) {
  html { background: red; }
}
@media (min-width: 600px) {
  html { background: green; }
}
@media (min-width: 800px) {
  html { background: blue; }
}

Media queries add no specificity to the selectors they contain, but source order still matters. The above will work because they are ordered correctly. Swap that order and at browser window widths above 800px the background would be red, perhaps inquisitively.

Mobile First

Your small screen styles are in your regular screen CSS and then as the screen gets larger you override what you need to. So, min-width media queries in general.

html { background: red; }

@media (min-width: 600px) {
  html { background: green; }
}

Desktop First

Your large screen styles are in your regular screen CSS and then as the screen gets smaller you override what you need to. So, max-width media queries in general.

html { background: red; }

@media (max-width: 600px) {
  html { background: green; }
}

You can be as complex as you want with this.

@media 
  only screen and (min-width: 100px),
  not all and (min-width: 100px),
  not print and (min-height: 100px),
  (color),
  (min-height: 100px) and (max-height: 1000px),
  handheld and (orientation: landscape)
{
  html { background: red; }
}

Note the only keyword was intended to prevent non-media-query supporting browsers to not load the stylesheet or use the styles. Not sure how useful that ever was / still is.

And for media queries priorites

sources : one two three four five

Upvotes: 1

Gokhan Dilek
Gokhan Dilek

Reputation: 4402

If you have not defined css properties for different medias, how do you expect the browser to render it?

You need to for example:

   @media only screen and (max-width: 480px) { 
   #header
     {
     width:100%
     background:red;
      }


    }

Upvotes: 0

Related Questions