Reputation: 4828
Is there a standard practice to organize the process of developing a simple website. there is no use implementing MVC as there is no data base involved. It will be very useful in organizing the project and separating
is there any industry standard or best practice for this.?
thanks in advance :)
Update: yes the way i have listed is convenient. but it would be great if i could separate server codes and files like master,aspx.. and the actual page content.
One more reason for not using MVC: I usually outsource the SEO process. Now an MVC application can be greek/latin for my SEO expert. :)
The final structure:
Project
Upvotes: 3
Views: 388
Reputation: 2074
ASP.Net MVC isn't just for database applications. In fact I would suggest it's easier to work with than webforms after the small learning curve. The concept of convention over configuration will help you with your question. There is a standard structure that MVC sets up for you that works great and anybody that opens your MVC code will be able to understand where everything is.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 4585
That is right there is no such industry standard for this. But in my opinion i really like the Web Application Template from ASP.Net 4.0. It is more like MVC Template but it remain very useful in terms of scalability.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 498934
No industry standards as such, but most developers I know would separate things out the way you did.
i.e. - different types of content in different directories.
Upvotes: 2