Kametrixom
Kametrixom

Reputation: 14973

How do I implement Swift's Comparable protocol?

How do I use the Comparable protocol in Swift? In the declaration it says I'd have to implement the three operations <, <= and >=. I put all those in the class but it doesn't work. Also do I need to have all three of them? Because it should be possible to deduce all of them from a single one.

Upvotes: 40

Views: 20873

Answers (3)

Ekra
Ekra

Reputation: 3301

Here is an update of Kametrixom's answer for Swift 3:

class Person : Comparable {

    let name : String

    init(name : String) {
        self.name = name
    }    

    static func < (lhs: Person, rhs: Person) -> Bool {
        return lhs.name < rhs.name
    }

    static func == (lhs: Person, rhs: Person) -> Bool {
        return lhs.name == rhs.name
    }
}

Instances of the Person class can then be compared with the relational operators as follows:

let paul = Person(name: "Paul")
let otherPaul = Person(name: "Paul")
let ben = Person(name: "Ben")

print(paul > otherPaul)  // false
print(paul <= ben)       // false
print(paul == otherPaul) // true

Upvotes: 9

Schemetrical
Schemetrical

Reputation: 5536

To implement Swift's Comparable protocol, you need to conform to the Equatable protocol first by implementing static func == (lhs: Self, rhs: Self) -> Bool, then implementing the only required function static func < (lhs: Self, rhs: Self) -> Bool for Comparable.

Instead of declaring global operator overloads, you should instead implement the protocol conforming methods within the struct/class itself. Although global operator overloads satisfy the protocol conformance, it's bad practice to declare them that way instead of the intended static methods on the struct/class.

If you look at the documentation example, you will see that the same is shown as sample code.

I would instead write the following:

class Person: Comparable {
    let name: String

    init(name: String) {
        self.name = name
    }

    static func < (lhs: Person, rhs: Person) -> Bool {
        return lhs.name < rhs.name
    }

    static func == (lhs: Person, rhs: Person) -> Bool {
        return lhs.name == rhs.name
    }
}

or even separate out the protocol conformance out of the class declaration like so:

class Person {
    let name: String

    init(name: String) {
        self.name = name
    }
}

extension Person: Comparable {
    static func < (lhs: Person, rhs: Person) -> Bool {
        return lhs.name < rhs.name
    }

    static func == (lhs: Person, rhs: Person) -> Bool {
        return lhs.name == rhs.name
    }
}

which would probably be closer to production level code.

Upvotes: 0

Kametrixom
Kametrixom

Reputation: 14973

The Comparable protocol extends the Equatable protocol -> implement both of them

In Apple's Reference is an example from Apple (within the Comparable protocol reference) you can see how you should do it: Don't put the operation implementations within the class, but rather on the outside/global scope. Also you only have to implement the < operator from Comparable protocol and == from Equatable protocol.

Correct example:

class Person : Comparable {
    let name : String

    init(name : String) {
        self.name = name
    }
}

func < (lhs: Person, rhs: Person) -> Bool {
    return lhs.name < rhs.name
}

func == (lhs: Person, rhs: Person) -> Bool {
    return lhs.name == rhs.name
}

let paul = Person(name: "Paul")
let otherPaul = Person(name: "Paul")
let ben = Person(name: "Ben")

paul > otherPaul  // false
paul <= ben       // false
paul == otherPaul // true

Upvotes: 68

Related Questions