Reputation: 1431
I have some classes that look something like this:
class Foo:
bar = None
@baz(frob=bar)
def oof():
pass
class Rab(Foo):
bar = 'zab'
I don't have control over the @baz
decorator and I need to to use the class attribute bar
of the new class Rab
. But calling Rab.oof()
uses the bar=None
of the base class.
Upvotes: 8
Views: 237
Reputation: 208465
So here is a kind of weird/interesting approach where you only need to modify Foo
, the idea here is that a new decorator is created that delays the baz
decoration until the function is first called with some caching based on the class name so that it only happens once.
Note that this also includes a dummy implementation for baz
which just prints the frob
argument that was provided, but this approach should work fine without needing to modify baz
:
def baz(frob):
def deco(func):
def wrapped(*args, **kwargs):
print('frob:', frob)
return func(*args, **kwargs)
return wrapped
return deco
def newdeco(func):
def wrapped(self, *args, **kwargs):
if not hasattr(wrapped, 'cache'):
wrapped.cache = {}
cls = self.__class__.__name__
if cls not in wrapped.cache:
wrapped.cache[cls] = baz(frob=getattr(self.__class__, 'bar'))(func)
wrapped.cache[cls](self, *args, **kwargs)
return wrapped
class Foo:
bar = None
@newdeco
def oof(self):
pass
class Rab(Foo):
bar = 'zab'
f = Foo()
f.oof()
r = Rab()
r.oof()
I also had to add a self
argument to oof
based on the assumption that oof
is a method, if baz
is also converting the function to a staticmethod I'm not sure this approach will work.
Upvotes: 5
Reputation: 64318
You can keep the undecorated version of oof
, let's call it _oof_raw
, and re-wrap it in your subclass definition. In order to keep the undecorated version, you need to decorate "manually", i.e. not using the @
syntactic sugar.
class Foo:
bar = None
def _oof_raw(self):
pass
oof = baz(frob=bar)(_oof_raw)
class Rab(Foo):
bar = 'zab'
oof = baz(frob=bar)(Foo._oof_raw)
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 26150
You could unwrap the closure from Foo
and pull out the wrapped function, then re-wrap it in the decorator in the derived class. But if there's any way you can get at Foo
or even baz
to change their implementation, it'd be better.
class Rab(Foo):
bar = 'zab'
oof = baz(frob=bar)(Foo.oof.func_closure[0].cell_contents)
Upvotes: 3