Reputation: 191
HTML:
<footer>
<div class="foot">
<ul>
<a href="https://www.facebook.com/" class="social"><span class="facebook"></span></a>
<a href="instagram" class="social"><span class="instagram"></span></a>
</ul>
</div>
</footer>
CSS:
.facebook {
display:block;
background-image:url("../images/facebook.png");
height:64px;
width:64px;
}
.instagram {
display:block;
background-image:url("../images/instagram.png");
height:64px;
width:64px;
}
.social {
height:64px;
width:64px;
display:inline-block;
position:relative;
margin:0 auto;
}
footer {
height:75px;
width:inherit;
bottom:0;
position:fixed;
}
.foot {
text-align:center;
}
The way I'm going about it could possibly be the wrong way. Any direction/advice would be great. I've tried using z-index and other properties but just nothing is working. I kinda wonder if it has to do with positioning/display inline.
Upvotes: 3
Views: 1822
Reputation: 701
A span
can have display:block
property, but why you add span if you have your link ? I cleaned up your html :
HTML
<footer class="foot">
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/" class="social social-facebook"></a></li>
<li><a href="instagram" class="social social-instagram"></a></li>
</ul>
</footer>
and CSS
.social-facebook {
background-image:url("../images/facebook.png");
}
.social-instagram {
background-image:url("../images/instagram.png");
}
.social {
height:64px;
width:64px;
display:block;
margin:0 auto;
}
.foot {
height:75px;
width:inherit;
bottom:0;
position:fixed;
text-align:center;
}
I removed properties repetition and add a little bit of OOCSS :)
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 215
The links worked for me with no trouble.
You don't even need the span
. You can move the class to the <a
and have either 2 (social & facebook), or just make it to one css each with the inline and margin.
<a href="https://www.facebook.com/" class="social facebook"></a>
<a href="instagram" class="social instagram"></a>
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 5326
A <span>
should not contain any display:block
elements anyway, it was designed for inline content although you can use it your way. Try use the <img>
tag instead.
And wrap all your lines inside li
s because you are using an ul
Upvotes: 4