Reputation: 135
I was given a query that uses some very weird syntax for a join and I need to understand how this join is being used:
SELECT
T1.Acct#
, T2.New_Acct#
, T3.Pool#
FROM DB.dbo.ACCT_TABLE T1
LEFT JOIN DB.dbo.CROSSREF_TABLE T2
INNER JOIN DB.dbo.POOL_TABLE T3
ON T2.Pool# = T3.Pool#
ON T1.Acct# = T2.Prev_Acct#
I need to return the previous account number held in T2 for each record in T1. I also need the T3 Pool# returned for each pool.
What I'm trying to understand is why someone would write the code this way. It doesn't make sense to me.
Upvotes: 12
Views: 10165
Reputation: 11
An OUTER APPLY would be clearer here:
SELECT
T1.Acct#,
T4.New_Acct#,
T4.Pool#
FROM DB.dbo.ACCT_TABLE T1
OUTER APPLY
(
SELECT
T2.New_Acct#,
T3.Pool#
FROM DB.dbo.CROSSREF_TABLE T2
INNER JOIN DB.dbo.POOL_TABLE T3 ON T2.Pool# = T3.Pool#
WHERE T1.Acct# = T4.Prev_Acct#
) T4
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 96552
A little indenting will show you better what was intended
SELECT
T1.Acct#
, T2.New_Acct#
, T3.Pool#
FROM DB.dbo.ACCT_TABLE T1
LEFT JOIN DB.dbo.CROSSREF_TABLE T2
INNER JOIN DB.dbo.POOL_TABLE T3
ON T2.Pool# = T3.Pool#
ON T1.Acct# = T2.Prev_Acct#
This is a valid syntax that forces the join order a bit. Basically it is asksing for only the records in table T2 that are also in table T3 and then left joining them to T1. I don't like it personally as it is confusing for maintenance. I would prefer a derived table as I find those much clearer and much easier to change when I need to do maintenance six months later:
SELECT
T1.Acct#
, T2.New_Acct#
, T3.Pool#
FROM DB.dbo.ACCT_TABLE T1
LEFT JOIN (select T2.New_Acct#, T3.Pool#
FROM DB.dbo.CROSSREF_TABLE T2
INNER JOIN DB.dbo.POOL_TABLE T3
ON T2.Pool# = T3.Pool#) T4
ON T1.Acct# = T4.Prev_Acct#
Upvotes: 16