Reputation: 41
Genetic Algorithm implementation in C#
I've recently started working with C# and I'm currently trying to implement a version of GA to solve Schwefel’s function(See code below). The code is based on a working Processing code that I built.
The first generation(first 100 individuals) seems to work fine but after that the fitness function gets repetitive values. I'm sure I'm missing something here but does anyone know what might be the problem?
public void button21_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
Population p;
// populationNum = 100;
p = new Population();
int gen = 0;
while (gen < 8000)
{
p.evolve();
}
++gen;
}
//Class Genotype
public partial class Genotype
{
public int[] genes;
public Genotype()
{
genes = new int[2];
for (int i = 0; i < genes.Length; i++)
{
Random rnd = new Random(int.Parse(Guid.NewGuid().ToString().Substring(0, 8), System.Globalization.NumberStyles.HexNumber));
//Random rnd = new Random(0);
int random = rnd.Next(256);
genes[i] = (int)random;
}
}
public void mutate()
{
//5% mutation rate
for (int i = 0; i < genes.Length; i++)
{
Random rnd = new Random(int.Parse(Guid.NewGuid().ToString().Substring(0, 8), System.Globalization.NumberStyles.HexNumber));
int random = rnd.Next(100);
if (random < 5)
{
//Random genernd = new Random();
int generandom = rnd.Next(256);
genes[i] = (int)generandom;
}
}
}
}
static Genotype crossover(Genotype a, Genotype b)
{
Genotype c = new Genotype();
for (int i = 0; i < c.genes.Length; i++)
{
//50-50 chance of selection
Random rnd = new Random(int.Parse(Guid.NewGuid().ToString().Substring(0, 8), System.Globalization.NumberStyles.HexNumber));
float random = rnd.Next(0, 1);
if (random < 0.5)
{
c.genes[i] = a.genes[i];
}
else
{
c.genes[i] = b.genes[i];
}
}
return c;
}
//Class Phenotype
public partial class Phenotype
{
double i_x;
double i_y;
public Phenotype(Genotype g)
{
i_x = g.genes[0] * 500 / 256;
i_y = g.genes[1] * 500 / 256;
}
public double evaluate()
{
double fitness = 0;
fitness -= (-1.0*i_x * Math.Sin(Math.Sqrt(Math.Abs(i_x)))) + (-1.0*i_y * Math.Sin(Math.Sqrt(Math.Abs(i_y))));
Console.WriteLine(fitness);
return fitness;
}
}
//Class Individual
public partial class Individual : IComparable<Individual>
{
public Genotype i_genotype;
public Phenotype i_phenotype;
double i_fitness;
public Individual()
{
this.i_genotype = new Genotype();
this.i_phenotype = new Phenotype(i_genotype);
this.i_fitness = 0;
}
public void evaluate()
{
i_fitness = i_phenotype.evaluate();
}
int IComparable<Individual>.CompareTo(Individual objI)
{
Individual iToCompare = (Individual)objI;
if (i_fitness < iToCompare.i_fitness)
{
return -1; //if I am less fit than iCompare return -1
}
else if (i_fitness > iToCompare.i_fitness)
{
return 1; //if I am fitter than iCompare return 1
}
return 0; // if we are equally return 0
}
}
static Individual breed(Individual a, Individual b)
{
Individual c = new Individual();
c.i_genotype = crossover(a.i_genotype, b.i_genotype);
c.i_genotype.mutate();
c.i_phenotype = new Phenotype(c.i_genotype);
return c;
}
//Class Population
public class Population
{
Individual[] pop;
int populationNum = 100;
public Population()
{
pop = new Individual[populationNum];
for (int i = 0; i < populationNum; i++)
{
this.pop[i] = new Individual();
pop[i].evaluate();
}
Array.Sort(this.pop);
}
public void evolve()
{
Individual a = select();
Individual b = select();
//breed the two selected individuals
Individual x = breed(a, b);
//place the offspring in the lowest position in the population, thus replacing the previously weakest offspring
pop[0] = x;
//evaluate the new individual (grow)
x.evaluate();
//the fitter offspring will find its way in the population ranks
Array.Sort(this.pop);
//rnd = new Random(0);
}
Individual select()
{
Random rnd = new Random(int.Parse(Guid.NewGuid().ToString().Substring(0, 8), System.Globalization.NumberStyles.HexNumber));
float random = rnd.Next(0, 1);
//skew distribution; multiplying by 99.999999 scales a number from 0-1 to 0-99, BUT NOT 100
//the sqrt of a number between 0-1 has bigger possibilities of giving us a smaller number
//if we subtract that squares number from 1 the opposite is true-> we have bigger possibilities of having a larger number
int which = (int)Math.Floor(((float)populationNum - 1e-6) * (1.0 - Math.Pow(random, random)));
return pop[which];
}
}
Upvotes: 0
Views: 7117
Answers (4)
Reputation: 94
Random.next(int min,int max), will generate only integers between the min and max values. try the (rnd.NextDouble) to generate a random number between 0 and 1. this what i can help right now :)
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 41
This an updated code that I think it performs well:
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using System.Threading;
namespace ConsoleApplication8
{
class Program
{
static Random random = new Random();
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Population p;
System.IO.StreamWriter file = new System.IO.StreamWriter("c:\\test.txt");
int population = 100;
p = new Population(file, population);
int gen = 0;
while (gen <= 1000)
{
p.evolve(file);
++gen;
}
file.Close();
}
public static double GetRandomNumber(double min, double max)
{
return (random.NextDouble() * (max - min)) + min;
//return random.NextDouble() *random.Next(min,max);
}
//Class Genotype
public class Genotype
{
public int[] genes;
public Genotype()
{
this.genes = new int[2];
for (int i = 0; i < genes.Length; i++)
{
this.genes[i] = (int)GetRandomNumber(-500.0, 500.0);
}
}
public void mutate()
{
//5% mutation rate
for (int i = 0; i < genes.Length; i++)
{
if (GetRandomNumber(0.0, 100) < 5)
{
//Random genernd = new Random();
this.genes[i] = (int)GetRandomNumber(0.0, 256.0);
}
}
}
}
static Genotype crossover(Genotype a, Genotype b)
{
Genotype c = new Genotype();
for (int i = 0; i < c.genes.Length; i++)
{
//50-50 chance of selection
if (GetRandomNumber(0.0, 1) < 0.5)
{
c.genes[i] = a.genes[i];
}
else
{
c.genes[i] = b.genes[i];
}
}
return c;
}
//Class Phenotype
public class Phenotype
{
double i_x;
double i_y;
public Phenotype(Genotype g)
{
this.i_x = g.genes[0];
this.i_y = g.genes[1];
}
public double evaluate(System.IO.StreamWriter file)
{
double fitness = 0;
//fitness -= i_x + i_y;
fitness -= (i_x*Math.Sin(Math.Sqrt(Math.Abs(i_x)))) + i_y*(Math.Sin(Math.Sqrt(Math.Abs(i_y))));
file.WriteLine(fitness);
return fitness;
}
}
//Class Individual
public class Individual : IComparable<Individual>
{
public Genotype i_genotype;
public Phenotype i_phenotype;
double i_fitness;
public Individual()
{
this.i_genotype = new Genotype();
this.i_phenotype = new Phenotype(i_genotype);
this.i_fitness = 0.0;
}
public void evaluate(System.IO.StreamWriter file)
{
this.i_fitness = i_phenotype.evaluate(file);
}
int IComparable<Individual>.CompareTo(Individual objI)
{
Individual iToCompare = (Individual)objI;
if (i_fitness < iToCompare.i_fitness)
{
return -1; //if I am less fit than iCompare return -1
}
else if (i_fitness > iToCompare.i_fitness)
{
return 1; //if I am fitter than iCompare return 1
}
return 0; // if we are equally return 0
}
}
public static Individual breed(Individual a, Individual b)
{
Individual c = new Individual();
c.i_genotype = crossover(a.i_genotype, b.i_genotype);
c.i_genotype.mutate();
c.i_phenotype = new Phenotype(c.i_genotype);
return c;
}
//Class Population
public class Population
{
Individual[] pop;
//int populationNum = 100;
public Population(System.IO.StreamWriter file, int populationNum)
{
this.pop = new Individual[populationNum];
for (int i = 0; i < populationNum; i++)
{
this.pop[i] = new Individual();
this.pop[i].evaluate(file);
}
Array.Sort(pop);
}
public void evolve(System.IO.StreamWriter file)
{
Individual a = select(100);
Individual b = select(100);
//breed the two selected individuals
Individual x = breed(a, b);
//place the offspring in the lowest position in the population, thus replacing the previously weakest offspring
this.pop[0] = x;
//evaluate the new individual (grow)
x.evaluate(file);
//the fitter offspring will find its way in the population ranks
Array.Sort(pop);
}
Individual select(int popNum)
{
//skew distribution; multiplying by 99.999999 scales a number from 0-1 to 0-99, BUT NOT 100
//the sqrt of a number between 0-1 has bigger possibilities of giving us a smaller number
//if we subtract that squares number from 1 the opposite is true-> we have bigger possibilities of having a larger number
int which = (int)Math.Floor(((float)popNum - 1E-6) * (1.0 - Math.Pow(GetRandomNumber(0.0, 1.0), 2)));
return pop[which];
}
}
}
}
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 29244
This is a problem:
float random = rnd.Next(0, 1); // returns an integer from 0 to 0 as a float
// Documentation states the second argument is exclusive
Try
float random = (float)rnd.NextDouble(); // rnd should be static, init'd once.
and replace all instances of Individual[] with List<Individual> which wraps an array and allows for easy Add(), InsertAt() and RemoveAt() methods.
PS. Also common convention has it to use PascalCasing for all methods and properties.
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 101
I think the biggest issue is with your select function.
The success of GA's depends a lot on picking the right Mutation, Evaluation and Selection techniques, although at first glance your selection function seems elegant to skew distribution, you're only skewing it based on relative position (i.e. Pop[0] < Pop[1]) but you're not taking into account how different they are from each other.
In GA's there's a HUGE difference between having the best individual have 100.0 Fitness and the Second have 99.9 than the best have 100.0 and the second have 75.0 and your selection function completely ignores this fact.
What is happening, why you see the repetitive fitness values, is because you're picking roughly the same individuals over and over, making your genetic pool stagnant and stalling in a local minimum (or maximum whatever you're looking for).
If you look for a method like Roullette (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fitness_proportionate_selection) they pick the probability as a function of the individual fitness divided over the total fitness, sharing the 'chance' of being picked among more individuals depending on how they behave, although this method can also get trapped in locals, it far less prone to than what you currently have, this should give you a very good boost on exploring the search space.
TL;DR - The selection function is not good enough as it is skewing the distribution too harshly and is only taking into account relative comparisons.
Upvotes: 0
Related Questions
- How to train a simple genetic algorithm in AForge/Accord.Net?
- Integration Test for Homemade Genetic Programming Framework
- Genetic Algorithm stops mutating
- Termination conditions for Genetic Algorithm?
- Genetic algorithm Selection
- Poor randomization in the Genetic Algorithm Framework
- Making of Genetic algorithm
- How would I go about coding this Genetic Algorithm?
- Genetic Programming Implementation
- C# data processing logic help