CODEWITHSUNDEEP
javaabstract-class
Cam
Cam

Reputation: 15234

How do I ensure my abstract class's function can only operate on extenders of the same type as the caller?

For example, let's say this is my abstract class:

abstract class A{
    int x;
    int y;

    void foo(A fooMe);
}

...and B and C are two classes which extend A.

What I want is for B to only be able to call foo() on other Bs, and for C to only be able to call foo() on other Cs. But I want this to be out of the hands of the programmer who's extending my A class - that is, I want a way to ensure this functionality within As code alone.

What can I do? (If possible) I'd like to avoid any hack or generics solution that's too messy - I still want foo to be able to be called like this, for example:

B b=new B();
B bb=new B();
bb.foo(b);

Edit: I'm now willing to accept a solution which uses generics, if anyone has any ideas... (I couldn't think of one)?

Upvotes: 0

Views: 146

Answers (3)

duffymo
duffymo

Reputation: 308753

You could enforce such a thing if you use aspect-oriented programming. Before advice could check and throw an exception for those cases that violated your requirements.

Upvotes: 0

Tralkdu
Tralkdu

Reputation: 1

Here's a hack, but it's not compile time. I don't think Java generics don't have enough covariant/contravariant type support.


class B extends A {
    @Override
    void foo(A foome) {
        if (foome.getClass() != getClass()) {
            throw new UnsupportedOperationException("...");
        }
    }
}

Upvotes: 0

Alex Martelli
Alex Martelli

Reputation: 881595

You could make foo be final in A, and implement it as follows: have it raise an exception unless fooMe.getClass() equals this.getClass(), and otherwise call abstract method fooHook. Of course, subclasses will have to override fooHook, not foo.

I believe the final-plus-hook approach is inevitable: if a subclass could override foo, there's no way A's code alone could guarantee that any checks performed in its foo aren't just going to be blithely bypassed by a subclass.

Upvotes: 1

Related Questions