Reputation: 2134
I'm testing out ranges of values (-1:34 just for kicks) for the function selected_real_kind
to determine the kind
parameter it returns and the actual number of bits of precision used by a variable defined using this kind
. I'm stuck with how to define variable RP
below, though, since the function to convert the variables x
, u
and alpha
(real(x,RP)
e.g.) require that RP
(the kind type) to be constant.
If I define RP to be a parameter
, i.e. at the top write integer, parameter :: RP
I have to initialize it immediately, and then I obviously can't change it because, well, it's a parameter
, so this won't work.
Here's what I have:
program f1
implicit none
integer :: n,t ! n used in selected_real_kind(n), t is precision (#bits)
integer :: RP
real :: x=1.5, u=1.0, alpha=1.0 ! will be reset using _RP below
print '(A2,A4,A4)', "n", "RP", "t" ! header for values
do n=-1,34
RP = selected_real_kind(n)
! convert x,u,alpha to type RP. These functions throw the error!
x = real(x,RP)
u = real(u,RP)
alpha = real(alpha,RP)
! init precision test variables
x=1.5_RP
u=1.0_RP
alpha=1.0_RP
! reset precision value to zero before each test
t = 0
! precision test
do while(x>alpha)
u = u/2.0_RP
x = alpha+u
t = t+1
end do
print '(I2 I4 I4)', n, RP, t
end do
end program f1
Upvotes: 2
Views: 574
Reputation: 6989
elaborating on my comment, here is a python example:
fortrancode = """
implicit none
integer, parameter :: n=%i
integer,parameter :: rp=selected_real_kind(n)
write(*,*)n,rp
end
"""
from subprocess import call
for n in range(-1,33):
f=open('test.f','w')
f.write(fortrancode%(n)) ! <- n here gets string substituted
!for the '%i' in fortrancode
f.close()
! optional check call(['grep','n=','test.f'])
call(['gfortran','test.f','-o','test.exe'])
call(['./test.exe'])
python test.py
-1 4
0 4
1 4
...
7 8
...
18 10
19 -1
...
32 -1
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 32366
Similar to george's answer, but in Fortran. We note that kinds are something that, essentially, must be known at compile-time. For that we ask the compiler which kinds it can offer us and, for each of those, create a small chunk of code to be compiled. Then compile and run it. [This last step certainly varies by system.]
! Rather than looping over a range with SELECTED_REAL_KIND, just see which
! real kinds are available to the compiler. We can later match up real kinds
! for a requested precision with those here.
use, intrinsic :: iso_fortran_env, only : real_kinds
implicit none
integer output
integer i
open(newunit=output, file='gosh.f90', action='write', position='rewind')
! Here we could instead do n=-1, 34 etc.
do i=1, SIZE(real_kinds)
write(output, 1) real_kinds(i)
end do
write(output, '("end")')
close(output)
! A compile/execute line - do whatever is required.
call execute_command_line('compile gosh.f90 && ./a.out')
1 FORMAT ("block",/,"real(",I0,") x",/,"include 'domystuffz'"/,"end block")
end
where "domystuffz" is a file containing whatever analysis is wanted. As with High Performance Mark's answer something intrinsic would be nice and the include
could be replaced by some simple code if required.
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 78324
Fortran provides a number of intrinsic functions for enquiring into the characteristics of the numbers it processes. Consult your documentation for functions such as digits
, precision
and radix
. All of these (including the ones I haven't mentioned but which your documentation will list) are generic (enough) to work on inputs of all the numeric kinds supported by your compiler.
You'll make headway faster using these functions than trying to roll your own. As you are discovering it's not a simple matter to write your own generic routines as Fortran wants kind selectors known (or knowable) at compile time. You'll also extend your knowledge of Fortran.
You may also find functions of interest in the intrinsic module IEEE_ARITHMETIC
.
Upvotes: 1