CODEWITHSUNDEEP
assemblyssesimdvisual-c++-2008
Mr. Boy
Mr. Boy

Reputation: 63710

Intrinsics Vs inline ASM for SSE coding in VC++ 2K8

I've done some inline ASM coding for SSE before and it was not too hard even for someone who doesn't know ASM. But I note MS also provide intrinsics wrapping many such special instructions.

Is there a particular performance difference, or any other strong reason why one should be used above the other?

To repeat from the title, this is specifically covering intrinsics exposed by VC++ 2008 for unmanaged, native C++.

Upvotes: 4

Views: 2373

Answers (4)

user1071136
user1071136

Reputation: 15725

Use intrinsics.

Using assembly will usually result in several days of non-stop work, only to find out the compiler beats your best performance by 5%. (5% if you're really good; most likely 30%.)

Upvotes: 0

Paul R
Paul R

Reputation: 212929

In general it's better to use intrinsics - it's more productive for the programmer and a good compiler (e.g. Intel ICC) will do a decent job of register allocation, instruction scheduling etc. The Microsoft compiler is not as good in this respect but it probably still does a reasonable job - you can always switch to ICC later if you need to get better performance.

Upvotes: 3

Ana Betts
Ana Betts

Reputation: 74654

Intrinsics are identical to their equivalent assembly instructions and you should use them if possible - the compiler knows to directly translate them, there is no performance difference.

Upvotes: 1

Michael
Michael

Reputation: 55395

There is no inline assembly in Visual C++ for x64. Intrinsics can be used on x64 as well. If you ever want to port your code to x64, you'll have to use intrinsics.

Upvotes: 4

Related Questions