CODEWITHSUNDEEP
javaperformancearraysmemory-managementprimitive-types
jd.
jd.

Reputation: 155

in java, which is better - three arrays of booleans or 1 array of bytes?

I know the question sounds silly, but consider this: I have an array of ints (1..N) and a labelling algorithm. at any point the item the int represents is in one of three states. The current version holds these states in a byte array, where 0, 1 and 2 represent the three states. alternatively, I could have three arrays of boolean - one for each state. which is better (consumes less memory) depends on how jvm (sun's version) stores the arrays - is a boolean represented by 1 bit? is there any other magic happening behind the scenes? (p.s. don't start with all that "this is not the way OO/Java works" - I know, but here performance comes in front. plus the algorithm is simple and perfectly readable even in such form).

Thanks a lot

Upvotes: 1

Views: 707

Answers (5)

Roman
Roman

Reputation: 66226

Theoretically, with 3 boolean arrays you'll need to do:

firstState[n] = false;
secondState[n] = true;
thirdState[n] = false;

every time when you want to change n-th element state. Here you can see 3 taking element by index operations and 3 assignment operations.

With 1 byte array you'll need:

elements[n] = 1;

It's more readable and 3 times faster. And one more advantage of this solution it that you can easily add as many new states as you want (when with boolean arrays you'll need to introduce new arrays).

But I don't think you'll ever see the performance difference.

UPD: actually I'd make it more java way (not looking that you don't find easy ways) and use array of enums. This will make it much more clear and will give you some flexibility (maybe in future you'll decide that oop is not so bad thing):

enum ElementState {
   FIRST, SECOND, THIRD;
}

ElementState[] elementStates = new ElementState[N];
...
elementStates[i] = ElementState.FIRST;

Upvotes: 2

Martijn Courteaux
Martijn Courteaux

Reputation: 68907

The array of bytes is much better!

  1. A boolean uses in every programming language 1 byte! So you will use for every state 3 bytes and you can do this with only 1 byte (in theory you can reduce it to only 1 bit (see other posts).
  2. with a byte array, you can simply change it to the byte you want. With three arrays you have to change the value at every array!
  3. When you are your application developing, it is possible you need an extra state. So, this means you have to create again an array. Plus you have to change 4 values (second point)

So, I hope we persuaded you!

Upvotes: 0

M. Jessup
M. Jessup

Reputation: 8222

If you want a guaranteed minimum you could use three java.util.BitSets. These will only use one bit per flag (though you will have the extra object overhead, that may outweigh the benefits if the number of flags is small.) I would say if you have a large number of objects BitSet may be a better alternative, otherwise an array of byte constants or enums will lead to more readable code (and the extra storage shouldn't be a real concern.)

Upvotes: 0

Steven Mackenzie
Steven Mackenzie

Reputation: 386

The JVM second edition spec (http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jvms/second_edition/html/Overview.doc.html) specifies that boolean arrays are encoded as (0,1), but doesn't specify the type used. So the particular JVM may or may not use bit - it could use int.

However, if performance is paramount, using a single byte would in any case seem to be your best option anyway.

EDIT: I incorrectly said that boolean arrays are stored as bit arrays - this is possible but implementation specific.

Upvotes: 1

Sripathi Krishnan
Sripathi Krishnan

Reputation: 31538

Instead of two booleans or 1 int, just use a BitSet - http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/util/BitSet.html

You can then have two bits per label/state. And BitSet being a standard java class, you are likely to get good performance.

Upvotes: 2

Related Questions