CODEWITHSUNDEEP
pythonlinuxbashlocking
Jan
Jan

Reputation: 1084

bash locking mechanism using sockets

I have found this solution to do a process locking mechanism in python:

import socket
import sys
import time

def get_lock(process_name):
    global lock_socket
    lock_socket = socket.socket(socket.AF_UNIX, socket.SOCK_DGRAM)
    try:
        lock_socket.bind('\0' + process_name)
        print 'I got the lock'
    except socket.error:
        print 'lock exists'
        sys.exit()

get_lock('running_test')
while True:
    time.sleep(3)

this was found here: Check to see if python script is running

Can the same be achieved in bash? If so, could someone please post a working example?

Many thanks

Upvotes: 1

Views: 1443

Answers (2)

Mike Atkinson
Mike Atkinson

Reputation: 1

I've used the following code fragment to avoid multiple concurrent invocation of a bash script 

#!/usr/bin/env bash
ScriptName=${0##*/}
FlockFile="/tmp/${ScriptName}.lck"
touch ${FlockFile} 2>/dev/null
[[ $? -ne 0 ]] && echo "Cannot access lock file ${FlockFile}" && exit 2
exec 5>${FlockFile}
flock -nx 5
[[ $? -ne 0 ]] && echo "Another instance of ${ScriptName} is running" && exit 1
chmod 666 ${FlockFile} 2>/dev/null
# Main script here

Upvotes: 0

Qiu Yangfan
Qiu Yangfan

Reputation: 891

While I wrote a bash script editing a file, meanwhile multiple process instances of this script need run simultaneously, and this caused some race condition which may mess my file. I found a mutual exclusive lock solution to solve my problem:

    # Add mutual exclusive lock in case there's race condition.
    {
        flock 201
        echo 'replace this echo with actions for your case' >> /tmp/file_to_edit
    } 201> /tmp/file_used_as_lock

Please note flock has a option -n, which means failure rather than wait. So with this option, you can decide to output error message instead of waiting.

Please refer to this http://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/045.

Upvotes: 3

Related Questions