Reputation: 14126
An abstract from Herbert Schildt book on Java,
After these two classes are compiled, the T in Gen will be replaced by Object. The T in GenStr will be replaced by String.
You can confirm this by running javap on their compiled classes. The results are shown here:
class Gen extends java.lang.Object{
java.lang.Object ob;
Gen(java.lang.Object);
java.lang.Object getob();
}
class GenStr extends java.lang.Object{
java.lang.String str;
GenStr(java.lang.String);
java.lang.String getstr();
}
EDIT: These 2 above are the outputs from the Herbert book.
//Here, T is bound by Object by default.
class Gen<T> {
T ob; // here, T will be replaced by Object
Gen(T o) {
ob = o;
}
// Return ob.
T getob() {
return ob;
}
}
//Here, T is bound by String.
class GenStr<T extends String> {
T str; // here, T will be replaced by String
GenStr(T o) {
str = o;
}
T getstr() {
return str;
}
}
After running javap in eclipse on these files, my results are:
class erasure.Gen<T> {
T ob;
erasure.Gen(T);
Code:
0: aload_0
1: invokespecial #13 // Method java/lang/Object."<init>":()V
4: aload_0
5: aload_1
6: putfield #16 // Field ob:Ljava/lang/Object;
9: return
T getob();
Code:
0: aload_0
1: getfield #16 // Field ob:Ljava/lang/Object;
4: areturn
}
and for GenStr.java :
class erasure.GenStr<T extends java.lang.String> {
T str;
erasure.GenStr(T);
Code:
0: aload_0
1: invokespecial #13 // Method java/lang/Object."<init>":()V
4: aload_0
5: aload_1
6: putfield #16 // Field str:Ljava/lang/String;
9: return
T getstr();
Code:
0: aload_0
1: getfield #16 // Field str:Ljava/lang/String;
4: areturn
}
The problem is I am not getting the output as Herbert Schildt mentions. I don't see either T being replaced by Object or String classes in above scenarios.
Upvotes: 0
Views: 70
Reputation: 310840
"After running javap in eclipse on these files, my results are ..."
No. Those are the results of running javap -c
.
6: putfield #16 // Field str:Ljava/lang/String;
You don't see that?
1: getfield #16 // Field str:Ljava/lang/String;
or that?
Upvotes: 4