Reputation: 107
This is kinda stupid question, but it's interesting for me )
This is what i get with visual studio 2013
int i = 07; // i == 7
int i = 16; // i == 16
int i = 00016; // i == 14, why?
int i = 05016; // i == 2574, wow )
int i = 08; // compile error, compiler expects octal number...
If number starts with zero and contains 8, it's compile error. Is this normal? And what exactly compiler does with starting zeros if 00016 == 14?
Thanks to all ))
Upvotes: 8
Views: 12353
Reputation: 385264
Yes, this is expected.
[C++11: 2.14.2/1]:
An integer literal is a sequence of digits that has no period or exponent part. An integer literal may have a prefix that specifies its base and a suffix that specifies its type. The lexically first digit of the sequence of digits is the most significant. A decimal integer literal (base ten) begins with a digit other than 0 and consists of a sequence of decimal digits. An octal integer literal (base eight) begins with the digit 0 and consists of a sequence of octal digits.22 A hexadecimal integer literal (base sixteen) begins with 0x or 0X and consists of a sequence of hexadecimal digits, which include the decimal digits and the letters a through f and A through F with decimal values ten through fifteen. [ Example: the number twelve can be written 12, 014, or 0XC. —end example ]22 The digits 8 and 9 are not octal digits.
Upvotes: 15
Reputation:
An integer literal that starts with 0
is an octal number, much like a number starting with 0x
is a hexadecimal number.
Octal numbers can only contain the digits 0
to 7
, and this is why you get a compilation error.
Upvotes: 7
Reputation: 132
Starting a number with 0 makes it Octal, so digits 8 and 9 are illegal, and your other examples show conversion to decimal.
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 477358
Integer literals that start with 0
are octal literals. Therefore they must only contain the digits 0–7.
(Amusingly, this includes the literal 0
itself.)
Upvotes: 5