Reputation: 12004
I currently allocate my memory for arrays using the MS specific mm_malloc. I align the memory, as I'm doing some heavy duty math and the vectorization takes advantage of the alignment. I was wondering if anyone knows how to overload the new operator to do the same thing, as I feel dirty malloc'ing everywhere (and would eventually like to also compile on Linux)? Thanks for any help
Upvotes: 8
Views: 11561
Reputation: 67789
First of all, it's important to note that new
and delete
can be overloaded either globally, or just for a single class. Both cases are shown in this article. Also important to note is that if you overload new
you almost certainly also want to overload delete
.
There are a few important notes about operator new
and operator delete
:
operator new[]
and operator delete[]
, so don't forget about overloading those.operator new
and its brethren, so make sure to override those.In Effective C++, item 8, Scott Meyers includes some pseudocodish examples:
void * operator new(size_t size) // your operator new might
{ // take additional params
if (size == 0) { // handle 0-byte requests
size = 1; // by treating them as
} // 1-byte requests
while (1) {
attempt to allocate size bytes;
if (the allocation was successful)
return (a pointer to the memory);
// allocation was unsuccessful; find out what the
// current error-handling function is (see Item 7)
new_handler globalHandler = set_new_handler(0);
set_new_handler(globalHandler);
if (globalHandler) (*globalHandler)();
else throw std::bad_alloc();
}
}
void operator delete(void *rawMemory)
{
if (rawMemory == 0) return; // do nothing if the null
// pointer is being deleted
deallocate the memory pointed to by rawMemory;
return;
}
For more information, I'd definitely pick up Effective C++.
Upvotes: 10
Reputation: 490178
new
is required to return a pointer [...] suitably aligned so that it can be converted to a pointer of any complete object type
(§3.7.3.1 of the standard).
FWIW, C++ 0x will add an alignof
that will tell you the alignment necessary for a particular type.
Upvotes: 3