Reputation: 3061
I'm trying to validate the protocol of an instance of defrecord that I generate dynamically using clojure.core/extend
Below You can see that satisfies returns true and (s/validate (s/protocol ...)) doesn't throw exception, but if I run s/with-fn-validation I get a "(not (satisfies? protocol ..... " schema exception although inside this body I keep getting the same true result for (satisfies? protocol x)
(ns wrapper.issue
(:require [schema.core :as s]))
(defprotocol Welcome
(greetings [e] )
(say_bye [e a b])
)
(s/defn greetings+ :- s/Str
[component :- (s/protocol Welcome)]
(greetings component))
(defrecord Example []
Welcome
(greetings [this] "my example greeting!")
(say_bye [this a b] (str "saying good bye from " a " to " b))
)
(defrecord MoreSimpleWrapper [e])
(extend MoreSimpleWrapper
Welcome
{:greetings (fn [this]
(str "wrapping!! " (greetings (:e this)))
)
:say_bye (fn [this a b]
(str "good bye !"))})
(println (satisfies? Welcome (MoreSimpleWrapper. (Example.))))
;;=>true
(println (s/validate (s/protocol Welcome) (MoreSimpleWrapper. (Example.))))
;;=>#wrapper.issue.MoreSimpleWrapper{:e #wrapper.issue.Example{}}
(s/with-fn-validation
(println (satisfies? Welcome (MoreSimpleWrapper. (Example.))))
;;=>true
(println (s/validate (s/protocol Welcome) (MoreSimpleWrapper. (Example.))))
;;=>#wrapper.issue.MoreSimpleWrapper{:e #wrapper.issue.Example{}}
)
(s/with-fn-validation
(greetings+ (MoreSimpleWrapper. (Example.))))
;;=>CompilerException clojure.lang.ExceptionInfo: Input to greetings+ does not match schema: [(named (not (satisfies? Welcome a-wrapper.issue.MoreSimpleWrapper)) component)] {:schema [#schema.core.One{:schema (protocol Welcome), :optional? false, :name component}], :value [#wrapper.issue.MoreSimpleWrapper{:e #wrapper.issue.Example{}}], :error [(named (not (satisfies? Welcome a-wrapper.issue.MoreSimpleWrapper)) component)]}, compiling:(/Users/tangrammer/git/olney/wrapper/src/wrapper/issue.clj:39:69)
Here also a gist with the code
Upvotes: 0
Views: 362
Reputation: 3061
It was a schema bug :)
now fixed in snapshot-0.3.2
https://github.com/Prismatic/schema/issues/164
Upvotes: 0