CODEWITHSUNDEEP
cbuildbuild-automationmakefile
Yktula
Yktula

Reputation: 14839

Reliable portability for C code without relying on the preprocessor

Relying on the preprocessor and predefined compiler macros for achieving portability seems hard to manage. What's a better way to achieve portability for a C project? I want to put environment-specific code in headers that behave the same way. Is there a way to have the build environment choose which headers to include?

I was thinking that I'd put the environment-specific headers into directories for specific environments. The build environment would then just copy the headers from the platform's directory into the root directory, build the project, and then remove the copies.

Upvotes: 3

Views: 216

Answers (3)

dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten
dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten

Reputation: 101259

pax's answer is good, but I'll add that you can

  1. Mix and Match Handle some system dependencies in the build system (big things, generally) and others with the preprocessor (small things)
  2. Confine the trouble Define a thin glue layer between your code and the system dependent bits, and stick all the preprocessor crap in there. So you always call MyFileOpen() which calls fopen on unix and something else on windows. Now the only part of your code that has any preprocessor cruft related to file opening is the MyFileOps module.

Upvotes: 2

paxdiablo
paxdiablo

Reputation: 882336

That depends entirely on your build environment of course and has nothing to do with C itself.

One thing you can try is to set up your include paths in your makefiles thus:

INCDIRS=-I ./solaris
#INCDIRS=-I ./windows
#INCDIRS=-I ./linux
:
CC=gcc $(INCDIRS) ...

and uncomment the one you're working on. Then put your platform specific headers in those directories:

./solaris/io.h
./windows/io.h
./linux/io.h

You could, at a pinch, even have different platform makefiles such as solaris.mk and windows.mk and not have to edit any files at all.

But I don't see your aversion to the preprocessor, that's one of the things it's good at, and people have been doing it successfully for decades. On top of that, what happens when your code needs to change per-platform. You can abstract the code into header files but that seems far harder to manage than a few #ifdefs to me.

Upvotes: 6

Scott Wales
Scott Wales

Reputation: 11716

This is basically what a configure script does - i.e. work out the specifics of the system and then modify the makefile for that system. Have a look at the documentation for GNU autoconf, it might do what you want, although I'm not sure how portable it would be to windows if that is necessary.

Upvotes: 3

Related Questions