CODEWITHSUNDEEP
c++boolean
108
108

Reputation: 1651

Why is a char and a bool the same size in c++?

I'm reading The C++ Programming Language. In it Stroustrup states that sizeof(char) == 1 and 1 <= sizeof(bool). The specifics depend on the implementation. Why would such a simple value as a boolean take the same space as a char?

Upvotes: 36

Views: 29329

Answers (7)

sep
sep

Reputation: 3495

A byte is the smallest addressable unit of memory.

Consider the following code:

    bool b[9];
    bool *pb0 = &b[0];
    bool *pb1 = &b[1];

    for (int counter=0; counter<9; ++counter)
    {
         // some code here to fill b with values
         b[counter] = true;

    }

If bool is stored as 1 bit, then pb0 will equal pb1, because both have the same address. This is clearly not desirable!

Additionally the assignment in the loop will result in non-trival assembly code. It will involve a different bit shift in each iteration of the loop. In high-performance software, those extra bit-shift operations can slow down the application needlessly.

The STL library provides a work-around in situations where space DO matter. The use of std::vector<bool> will store bool as 1 bit. The paradox of the example above do not apply because

  • the overloading of operator[] hides the rigors of the bit shift operation
  • the use of iterators instead of pointers give additional flexibilty to the implementation

Upvotes: 3

Robert Gamble
Robert Gamble

Reputation: 109182

Because in C++ you can take the address of a boolean and most machines cannot address individual bits.

Upvotes: 23

David Nehme
David Nehme

Reputation: 21597

There is this thing in C++ called vector that attempts to exploit the fact that you can theoretically store 8 bools in one char, but it's widely regarded as a mistake by the C++ standards committee. The book "effective stl" actually says "don't use it". That should give you an idea of how tricky it is.

BTW: Knuth has a book just dedicated to bitwise operations. Boost also has a library dedicated to handling large numbers of bits in a more memory efficient way.

Upvotes: 2

James Curran
James Curran

Reputation: 103605

Actually, in most implementation that I know of sizeof(bool) == sizeof(int). "int" is intended to be the data size that is most efficient for the CPU to work with. Hence things which do not have a specific size (like "char") are the same size as an int. If you had a large number of them per object, you may want to implement a means of packing them for storage, but during normal calculation, it should be left it's native size.

Upvotes: 2

Cybis
Cybis

Reputation: 9883

In modern computer architectures, a byte is the smallest addressable unit of memory. To pack multiple bits into a byte requires applying extra bit-shift operations. At the compiler level, it's a trade off of memory vs. speed requirements (and in high-performance software, those extra bit-shift operations can add up and slow down the application needlessly).

Upvotes: 70

Rob Walker
Rob Walker

Reputation: 47502

Theoretically you only need a single bit for a bool, but working with less than 1 byte's worth of data is messy. You need more instructions to achieve anything and you don't really benefit.

If you want to pack multiple booleans into a single byte you can use a bit-field structure.

Upvotes: 5

Kibbee
Kibbee

Reputation: 66162

It takes the same space, because the smallest amount of space you can write in memory is a single byte. Both values are stored in a byte. Although you theoretically only need 1 bit to signify a boolean value, you still have to have a whole byte to store the value.

Upvotes: 12

Related Questions