Reputation: 2836
I'm making a directive for a States Select in angular. It's working, but I spent a while trying to figure out a way to compile the template before it's in the DOM. It currently works like this:
app.register.directive('stateDropdown', ['StatesFactory', '$compile', function (StatesFactory, $compile) {
function getTemplate(model) {
var html = '<select ng-model="' + model + '" ng-options="state.abbreviation as state.name for state in states" class="form-control"></select>';
return html;
}
function link (scope, element, attrs) {
scope.states = StatesFactory.States;
element.html(getTemplate(attrs.stateModel));
$compile(element.contents())(scope);
}
return {
replace: true,
link: link
}
}]);
But as such it inserts the template into the element THEN compiles it against scope. Is there a better way to do this? Such as compiling the template before it's even inserted?
Upvotes: 2
Views: 1622
Reputation: 5254
Scratch what I had before.
[Edit 2]
Using a dynamic model is a bit problematic trying to fit it into the normal Angular workflow. Instead you will need to compile the template in the directive by hand but add the ng-model before doing so, You will also need to manage the replacement of the existing element with the built template.
module.directive('stateDropdown', function (StatesFactory, $compile) {
var template = '<select ng-options="state.abbreviation as state.name for state in states" class="form-control"></select>';
return {
scope: true,
controller: function($scope) {
$scope.states = StatesFactory.states;
},
compile: function($element, $attrs) {
var templateElem = angular.element(template).attr('ng-model', '$parent.' + $attrs.stateModel);
$element.after(templateElem);
$element.remove();
var subLink = $compile(templateElem);
return {
pre: function(scope, element, attrs) {
subLink(scope);
},
post: function(scope, element, attrs) {
}
}
}
};
});
A working example of this can be found here: http://jsfiddle.net/u5uz2po7/2/
The example uses an isolated scope so that applying the 'states' to the scope does not affect existing scopes. That is also the reason for the '$parent.' in the ng-model.
Upvotes: 3