Reputation: 990
I have a list called cols
with column names in it:
cols <- c('Column1','Column2','Column3')
I'd like to reproduce this command, but with a call to the list:
data.frame(Column1=rnorm(10))
Here's what happens when I try it:
> data.frame(cols[1]=rnorm(10))
Error: unexpected '=' in "data.frame(I(cols[1])="
The same thing happens if I wrap cols[1]
in I()
or eval()
.
How can I feed that item from the vector into the data.frame()
command?
Update:
For some background, I have defined a function calc.means()
that takes a data frame and a list of variables and performs a large and complicated ddply operation, summarizing at the level specified by the variables.
What I'm trying to do with the data.frame()
command is walk back up the aggregation levels to the very top, re-running calc.means()
at each step and using rbind()
to glue the results onto one another. I need to add dummy columns with 'All' values in order to get the rbind to work properly.
I'm rolling cast
-like margin functionality into ddply, basically, and I'd like to not retype the column names for each run. Here's the full code:
cols <- c('Col1','Col2','Col3')
rbind ( calc.means(dat,cols),
data.frame(cols[1]='All', calc.means(dat, cols[2:3])),
data.frame(cols[1]='All', cols[2]='All', calc.means(dat, cols[3]))
)
Upvotes: 4
Views: 11069
Reputation: 6363
I believe the assign() function is your answer:
cols <- c('Col1','Col2','Col3')
data.frame(assign(cols[1], rnorm(10)))
Returns:
assign.cols.1...rnorm.10..
1 -0.02056822
2 -0.03675639
3 1.06249599
4 0.41763399
5 0.38873118
6 1.01779018
7 1.01379963
8 1.86119518
9 0.35760039
10 1.14742560
With the lapply() or sapply() function, you should be able to loop the cbind() process. Something like:
operation <- sapply(cols, function(x) data.frame(assign(x, rnorm(10))))
final <- data.frame(lapply(operation, cbind))
Returns:
Col1.assign.x..rnorm.10.. Col2.assign.x..rnorm.10.. Col3.assign.x..rnorm.10..
1 0.001962187 -0.3561499 -0.22783816
2 -0.706804781 -0.4452781 -1.09950505
3 -0.604417525 -0.8425018 -0.73287079
4 -1.287038060 0.2545236 -1.18795684
5 0.232084366 -1.0831463 0.40799046
6 -0.148594144 0.4963714 -1.34938144
7 0.442054119 0.2856748 0.05933736
8 0.984615916 -0.0795147 -1.91165189
9 1.222310749 -0.1743313 0.18256877
10 -0.231885977 -0.2273724 -0.43247570
Then, to clean up the column names:
colnames(final) <- cols
Returns:
Col1 Col2 Col3
1 0.19473248 0.2864232 0.93115072
2 -1.08473526 -1.5653469 0.09967827
3 -1.90968422 -0.9678024 -1.02167873
4 -1.11962371 0.4549290 0.76692067
5 -2.13776949 3.0360777 -1.48515698
6 0.64240694 1.3441656 0.47676056
7 -0.53590163 1.2696336 -1.19845723
8 0.09158526 -1.0966833 0.91856639
9 -0.05018762 1.0472368 0.15475583
10 0.27152070 -0.2148181 -1.00551111
Cheers,
Adam
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 50704
There is one trick. You could mess with lists:
cols_dummy <- setNames(rep(list("All"), 3), cols)
Then if you use call to list with one paren then you should get what you want
data.frame(cols_dummy[1], calc.means(dat, cols[2:3]))
You could use it on-the-fly as setNames(list("All"), cols[1])
but I think it's less elegant.
Example:
some_names <- list(name_A="Dummy 1", name_B="Dummy 2") # equivalent of cols_dummy from above
data.frame(var1=rnorm(3), some_names[1])
# var1 name_A
# 1 -1.940169 Dummy 1
# 2 -0.787107 Dummy 1
# 3 -0.235160 Dummy 1
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 9050
Use can use structure
:
cols <- c("a","b")
foo <- structure(list(c(1, 2 ), c(3, 3)), .Names = cols, row.names = c(NA, -2L), class = "data.frame")
I don't get why you are doing this though!
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 11473
I'm not sure how to do it directly, but you could simply skip the step of assigning names in the data.frame() command. Assuming you store the result of data.frame() in a variable named foo, you can simply do:
names(foo) <- cols
after the data frame is created
Upvotes: 1