Reputation: 55
I need to replicate - or at least find an alternative solution - for a SUMIFS function I have in Excel.
I have a transactional database:
SegNbr Index Revenue SUMIF
A 1 10 30
A 1 20 30
A 2 30 100
A 2 40 100
B 1 50 110
B 1 60 110
B 3 70 260
B 3 80 260
and I need to create another column that sums the Revenue, by SegmentNumber, for all indexes that are equal or less the Index in that row. It is a distorted rolling revenue as it will be the same for each SegmentNumber/Index key. This is the formula is this one:
=SUMIFS([Revenue],[SegNbr],[@SegNbr],[Index],"<="&[@Index])
Upvotes: 0
Views: 486
Reputation: 206232
Let's say you have this sample data.frame
dd<-read.table(text="SegNbr Index Revenue
A 1 10
A 1 20
A 2 30
A 2 40
B 1 50
B 1 60
B 3 70
B 3 80", header=T)
Now if we make sure the data is ordered by segment and index, we can do
dd<-dd[order(dd$SegNbr, dd$Index), ] #sort data
dd$OUT<-with(dd,
ave(
ave(Revenue, SegNbr, FUN=cumsum), #get running sum per seg
interaction(SegNbr, Index, drop=T),
FUN=max, na.rm=T) #find largest sum per index per seg
)
dd
This gives
SegNbr Index Revenue OUT
1 A 1 10 30
2 A 1 20 30
3 A 2 30 100
4 A 2 40 100
5 B 1 50 110
6 B 1 60 110
7 B 3 70 260
8 B 3 80 260
as desired.
Upvotes: 1