Reputation: 5361
Let's consider a simple scenario of 'Company' and 'Employee' models.
A company has many employees. Now, when I map this relationship in Laravel, what is the correct approach from the following?
Approach 1:
Employee belongsTo() Company
and Company hasMany() Employee
Approach 2:
Company belongsToMany() Employee
and Employee hasOne() Company
Basically, what is the difference between belongsTo()-hasMany()
and belongsToMany()-hasOne()
?
Upvotes: 2
Views: 444
Reputation: 25374
There are three different approaches, in your question you're mixing them up a little. I'll go through all of them.
A many-to-many relationship would mean, in your example, that a company can have multiple employees and that an employee can work for multiple companies.
So when you're using the belongsToMany()
method on a relation, that implies you have a pivot table. Laravel by default assumes that this table is named after both other tables, e.g. company_employee
in the example. Both the Company
model and the Employee
model would then have belongsToMany()
relations.
However, using hasMany()
means that it's a one-to-many relationship. If we look at the example again, a company might have many employees but each employee would only be able to be employed by one company.
In the models, that means the Company
would have a hasMany()
method in its relationship declaration, while the Employee
would have a belongsTo()
method.
Finally, hasOne()
means that it's a one-to-one relationship. What it would mean in your example is that each company may only have one employee. Since the inverse of hasOne()
is also belongsTo()
, in this scenario, too, every employee could be employed by only one company.
The Company
model would then have a hasOne()
relationship method, with the Employee
having a belongsTo()
method.
In practice, you almost always want to construct a database that is as close to reality in its representation as possible. What relationships you use depends on what your case looks like. In the example, I would guess that you want a many-to-one approach, with a foreign key on the employees table, that references the id on the companies table. But ultimately, that's up to you. Hope that helped. :)
Upvotes: 1