ZeroCool
ZeroCool

Reputation: 1500

Metaprogramming with std::is_same

Is it possible to do something like the following that compiles without template specialization?

template <class T> 
class A {
public:
    #if std::is_same<T, int>
        void has_int() { }
    #elif std::is_same<T, char>
        void has_char() { }
    #endif
};
A<int> a; a.has_int();
A<char> b; b.has_char();

Upvotes: 13

Views: 14694

Answers (2)

jrok
jrok

Reputation: 55415

Yes. Make the function templates and then conditionaly enable them using std::enable_if:

#include <type_traits>

template <class T> 
class A {
public:

  template<typename U = T>
  typename std::enable_if<std::is_same<U,int>::value>::type
  has_int() {}

  template<typename U = T>
  typename std::enable_if<std::is_same<U,char>::value>::type
  has_char() {}
};

int main()
{
    A<int> a;
    a.has_int();   // OK
    // a.has_char();  // error
}

The solution from the other answer might not be feasible if the class is big and has got many functions that need to regardless of T. But you can solve this by inheriting from another class that is used only for these special methods. Then, you can specialize that base class only.

In C++14, there are convenient type aliases so the syntax can become:

std::enable_if_t<std::is_same<U, int>::value>

And C++17, even shorter:

std::enable_if_t<std::is_same_v<U, int>>

Upvotes: 24

BЈовић
BЈовић

Reputation: 64253

Yes, with template specialization :

template <class T> 
class A;

template <> 
class A<int>
{
    void had_int(){}
};

template <> 
class A<char>
{
    void had_char(){}
};

Upvotes: 6

Related Questions