Reputation: 11689
I am working with JSON and I will have JSON like this - I called it as originalJsonResponse
. All the below json are same, it's just that user_id
and uid
field might have these types of variations -
{ "user_id": { "long": 159002376 }, "filter": { "string": "hello" } }
{ "user_id": { "string": "159002376" }, "filter": { "string": "hello" } }
{ "user_id": "159002376" , "filter": { "string": "hello" } }
{ "user_id": 159002376 , "filter": { "string": "hello" } }
{ "user_id": null, "filter": { "string": "hello" } }
{ "uid": { "long": 159002376 }, "filter": { "string": "hello" } }
{ "uid": { "string": "159002376" }, "filter": { "string": "hello" } }
{ "uid": "159002376" , "filter": { "string": "hello" } }
{ "uid": 159002376 , "filter": { "string": "hello" } }
{ "uid": null, "filter": { "string": "hello" } }
{ "filter": { "string": "hello" } }
Now I need to extract user_id
or uid
field from the JSON (if it is present) and if the value of those fields are not null, then change the value of those fields to a new user id and then construct another new json with the new user id in it.
As an example, I will have newUserId
as 1267818821
, then my new json should look like this and new json should have the same structure as old json -
{ "user_id": { "long": 1267818821 }, "filter": { "string": "hello" } }
{ "user_id": { "string": "1267818821" }, "filter": { "string": "hello" } }
{ "user_id": "1267818821" , "filter": { "string": "hello" } }
{ "user_id": 1267818821 , "filter": { "string": "hello" } }
{ "user_id": null, "filter": { "string": "hello" } }
{ "uid": { "long": 1267818821 }, "filter": { "string": "hello" } }
{ "uid": { "string": "1267818821" }, "filter": { "string": "hello" } }
{ "uid": "1267818821" , "filter": { "string": "hello" } }
{ "uid": 1267818821 , "filter": { "string": "hello" } }
{ "uid": null, "filter": { "string": "hello" } }
{ "filter": { "string": "hello" } }
What is the best way to do this obfuscation of user_id
and uid
field?
Below is my method in which I want to do the obfuscation -
private static String obfuscateJson(String originalJsonResponse, String oldUserId, String newUserId) {
// here oldUserId is 159002376 and newUserId is 1267818821
// not sure what I should do here to construct a new json with newUserId
String newJsonResponse = // make a new json here
return newJsonResponse;
}
I cannot use replaceAll
method here (that's what I have started with and realize it will not work) since I might have another json with different fields and those fields might have oldUserId
number in it so I don't want to replace those. Is there any better way of doing this?
// not a good solution
String newJsonResponse = originalJsonResponse.replaceAll(String.valueOf(oldUserId), String.valueOf(newUserId));
I want to make this more generic so that in future if I want to replace some other fields instead of user_id
and uid
field, then I should be able to do it easily.
Upvotes: 0
Views: 759
Reputation: 51711
Since you've shared all the possible input JSON string patterns for the user_id
field here, I would like to present again my JSON parser solution proposed before but updated to handle your different JSON types now.
public static void main(String[] args) {
String[][] jsonInputs = new String[6][2];
jsonInputs[0][0] = "Long-Object";
jsonInputs[0][1] = "{ \"user_id\":{\"long\":876},\"client_id\":{\"int\":0},\"affinity\":[{\"try\":{\"long\":55787693},\"scoring\":{\"float\":0.19}},{\"try\":{\"long\":1763},\"scoring\":{\"float\":0.0114}}]}";
jsonInputs[1][0] = "String-Object";
jsonInputs[1][1] = "{ \"user_id\":{\"string\": \"876\"},\"client_id\":{\"int\":0},\"affinity\":[{\"try\":{\"long\":55787693},\"scoring\":{\"float\":0.19}},{\"try\":{\"long\":1763},\"scoring\":{\"float\":0.0114}}]}";
jsonInputs[2][0] = "String";
jsonInputs[2][1] = "{ \"user_id\": \"1267818821\" , \"filter\": { \"string\": \"hello\" } }";
jsonInputs[3][0] = "Long";
jsonInputs[3][1] = "{ \"user_id\": 1267818821 , \"filter\": { \"string\": \"hello\" } }";
jsonInputs[4][0] = "Null";
jsonInputs[4][1] = "{ \"user_id\": null , \"filter\": { \"string\": \"hello\" } }";
jsonInputs[5][0] = "Not-Present";
jsonInputs[5][1] = "{ \"filter\": { \"string\": \"hello\" } }";
for (String[] json : jsonInputs) {
System.out.println(json[0]);
System.out.println(changeJsonString(json[1], "54321"));
System.out.println();
}
}
private static String changeJsonString(String originalResponse, String newId) {
try {
JSONObject root = new JSONObject(originalResponse);
if (!root.isNull("user_id")) {
Object userObj = root.get("user_id");
if (userObj instanceof JSONObject) {
JSONObject userId = (JSONObject) userObj;
if (userId.has("long")) {
userId.put("long", Long.parseLong(newId));
} else {
userId.put("string", newId);
}
} else if (userObj instanceof Number) {
root.put("user_id", Long.parseLong(newId));
} else {
root.put("user_id", newId);
}
}
return root.toString();
} catch (JSONException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
return null;
}
}
Output :
Long-Object
{"user_id":{"long":54321},"client_id":{"int":0},"affinity":[{"scoring":{"float":0.19},"try":{"long":55787693}},{"scoring":{"float":0.0114},"try":{"long":1763}}]}
String-Object
{"user_id":{"string":"54321"},"client_id":{"int":0},"affinity":[{"scoring":{"float":0.19},"try":{"long":55787693}},{"scoring":{"float":0.0114},"try":{"long":1763}}]}
String
{"filter":{"string":"hello"},"user_id":"54321"}
Long
{"filter":{"string":"hello"},"user_id":54321}
Null
{"filter":{"string":"hello"},"user_id":null}
Not-Present
{"filter":{"string":"hello"}}
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 15306
This is not a use case that lends itself to regular expressions.
For this type of thing a JSON Processor is definitely what you would want to use. This way you can deserialize the incoming JSON into a class you define, alter the values and structure as needed, and then serialize it back into the outgoing JSON response.
I use and would recommend Jackson, but you could use GSON also if you wanted. There's also a Jackson quickstart tutorial.
You could specify that only non-null values get serialized by the annotation @JsonInclude(Include.NON_NULL)
, so that if, say, the JSON had user_id
but not uid
, the null
uid
would not get serialized.
To handle the complexity of the different variations within a particular property (e.g. user_id
as a long
or a string
or a nested hash of either type), it would probably be best to write custom serializers and deserializers. GSON has these as well.
Upvotes: 0