Reputation: 173
We are a software company that has a few different projects and lines. We have decided to go with the GitHub Flow model. However, we hit a small roadblock and was wondering how it's handled elsewhere.
Our developers...
However, there is a major slowdown in that, anytime one branch is merged into master, all the other branches that are currently in queue need to be resync'd and then QA'd. So, instead of multiple QA's working on multiple branches, they almost have to wait until one is done. resync.. QA. I know automated testing will help and we are building that out right now, but is there another way?
Upvotes: 0
Views: 205
Reputation: 3364
You don't need to rebase master
or merge master
(I suppose that's what you mean by resync) after master
has been updated. Instead, you can merge the topic branch directly into master. You can skip step 2 above. From the GitHub Flow (emphasis added):
If the branch has been open for too long and you feel it’s getting out of sync with the master branch, you can merge master into your topic branch and keep going. You can easily see in the pull request discussion or commit list when the branch was last brought up to date with the ‘master’.
You only need to merge master
into your topic branch if you think your topic branch may break the updated master
. Otherwise, you can directly merge the topic branch into master
.
Upvotes: 1