Reputation: 269
I would like my SQL query to return a row even if there is no row matching in my IN clause.
For exemple this query:
SELECT id, foo
FROM table
WHERE id IN (0, 1, 2, 3)
would return:
id|foo
0|bar
1|bar
2|bar
3|null
But instead I have (because no row with id 3):
id|foo
0|bar
1|bar
2|bar
I have been able to find this trick:
SELECT tmpTable.id, table.bar
FROM (
SELECT 0 as id
UNION SELECT 1
UNION SELECT 2
UNION SELECT 3
) tmpTable
LEFT JOIN
(
SELECT table.foo, table.id
FROM table
WHERE table.id IN (0, 1, 2, 3)
) table
on table.id = tmpTable.id
Is there a better way?
Bonus: How to make it work with myBatis's list variable?
Upvotes: 1
Views: 324
Reputation: 1402
overslacked is right. Most SQL developers use an auxiliary table that stores integers (and one that stores dates). This is outlined in an entire chapter of Joe Celko's "SQL for Smarties".
Example:
CREATE TABLE numeri ( numero INTEGER PRIMARY KEY )
DECLARE @x INTEGER
SET @x = 0
WHILE @x < 1000
BEGIN
INSERT INTO numeri ( numero ) VALUES ( @x )
SET @x = @x + 1
END
SELECT
numero AS id,
foo
FROM
numeri
LEFT OUTER JOIN my_table
ON my_table.id = numero
WHERE
numero BETWEEN 0 AND 3
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 25
What about just saying:
SELECT id, foo FROM table WHERE id >= 0 AND <= 3
Upvotes: -1
Reputation:
Main Goal of Programming minimal code high performance no need this things just remove id 3 from in clause
Upvotes: -1