CODEWITHSUNDEEP
javacasting
maximus335
maximus335

Reputation: 684

Implicit type cast not working for method parameters?

Consider the following code snippet:

class TypeCast{
  public static void main(String[] args){
    byte by = 4;     //compiler casts int literal to byte

    doCasting(4);    //Compilation Error: external type casting is required. WHY ?

  }

  public static void doCasting(byte by){

  }

}

I think above code snippet is quite self-explanatory. While int literal assignment to byte type, compiler does the required cast automatically. Same thing does not happen when we call a method taking byte parameter with int literal. Why?

Upvotes: 16

Views: 1812

Answers (1)

Jon Skeet
Jon Skeet

Reputation: 1500375

This is the difference between an assignment context (JLS 5.2) and an invocation context (JLS 5.3) for conversions.

Assignment context conversions include:

In addition, if the expression is a constant expression (§15.28) of type byte, short, char, or int:

  • A narrowing primitive conversion may be used if the type of the variable is byte, short, or char, and the value of the constant expression is representable in the type of the variable.

That isn't present in the invocation context conversions.

It's not clear to me why the language was designed that way, other than to possibly simplify overload resolution - if you had:

doCasting(5);
...
doCasting(int x) {}
doCasting(byte b) {}

then you could argue for either of them being the "best match" - byte is a more specific type than int, but if you think of the literal as being of type int, then the byte overload makes requires a conversion whereas the int overload doesn't.

By making the byte overload simply not applicable, the question is removed.

Upvotes: 16

Related Questions