Reputation: 151
I am currently learning a little more about using Bash shell on OSX terminal. I am trying to pipe the output of a cut command into a grep command, but the grep command is not giving any output even though I know there are matches. I am using the following command:
cut -d'|' -f2 <filename.txt> > <temp.txt> | grep -Ff <temp.txt> <searchfile.txt> > <filematches.txt>
I was thinking that this should work, but most of the examples I have seen normally pipe grep output into the cut. My goal was to cut field 2 from the file and use that as the pattern to search for in . However, using the command produced no output.
When I generated the temp.txt first with the cut command and then ran the grep on it manually with no pipe, the grep seemed to run fine. I am not sure why this is?
Upvotes: 2
Views: 3637
Reputation: 112366
Okay, a reason this line doesn't behave as you expect
cut -d'|' -f2 <filename.txt> > <temp.txt> | grep -Ff <temp.txt> <searchfile.txt> > <filematches.txt>
is that the output of your cut is going to temp.txt
. You're not sending anything to the pipe. Now, conveniently pipe also starts a new commend, so it doesn't matter much -- grep
runs and reads searchfile.txt
.
But what are you trying to do? Here's what your command line is trying to do:
match1\nmatch2...
)You'd be closer with
cut ... && grep ...
as that runs grep assuming cut completes effectively. Or you could use
grep -f `cut ...`
which would put the results on the command line. You need to mess with quoting, but you're still going to be looking for a line containing ALL of your match fields from cut.
I'd recommend maybe you mean something like this:
for match in `cut ...`
do
grep -f $match >> filematches.txt
done
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 785098
You can use process substitution here:
grep -Ff <(cut -d'|' -f2 filename.txt) searchfile.txt > filematches.txt
<(cut -d'|' -f2 filename.txt)
is feeding cut command's output to grep
as a file.
Upvotes: 5