Reputation: 998
I'm facing issue with my Graph implementation, specifically the function printGraph()
. This function contains a loop to print the adjacency list representation of the graph. If I loop though using the member object variable adj
then it shows me the correct output which is:
0 : 1 2 2
1 : 0 2
2 : 0 1 0 3
3 : 2 3 3
However, If I use the getter method adjL()
then it provides me a wrong output which is:
0 : 0 0 2
1 : 0 0
2 : 0 0 0 3
3 : 0 0 3
Most likely I am making a stupid mistake but I can't seem to catch it. Any help is appreciated. I think I am not able to understand how to use the value returned by the getter method adjL()
.
class UndirectedGraph {
//vector<vector <int> > adj;
public:
vector<vector <int> > adj;
UndirectedGraph(int vCount); /* Constructor */
void addEdge(int v, int w); /* Add an edge in the graph */
vector<int> adjL(const int v) const ; /* Return a vector of vertices adjacent to vertex @v */
void printGraph();
};
UndirectedGraph::UndirectedGraph(int vCount): adj(vCount) {
}
void UndirectedGraph::addEdge(int v, int w) {
adj[v].push_back(w);
adj[w].push_back(v);
edgeCount++;
}
vector<int> UndirectedGraph::adjL(const int v) const {
return adj[v];
//return *(adj.begin() + v);
}
void UndirectedGraph::printGraph() {
int count = 0;
for(vector<vector <int> >::iterator iter = adj.begin(); iter != adj.end(); ++iter) {
cout << count << " : ";
/*
for(vector<int>::iterator it = adj[count].begin(); it != adj[count].end(); ++it) {
cout << *it << " ";
}
*/
for(vector<int>::iterator it = adjL(count).begin(); it != adjL(count).end(); ++it) {
cout << *it << " ";
}
++count;
cout << endl;
}
}
int main() {
UndirectedGraph g(4);
g.addEdge(0, 1);
g.addEdge(0, 2);
g.addEdge(1, 2);
g.addEdge(2, 0);
g.addEdge(2, 3);
g.addEdge(3, 3);
g.printGraph();
}
Upvotes: 2
Views: 1185
Reputation: 385144
Since adjL
curiously returns by value, the following line is broken:
for(vector<int>::iterator it = adjL(count).begin(); it != adjL(count).end(); ++it) {
You're comparing iterators from two different containers, and you're storing an iterator to a temporary that immediately goes out of scope, its value(s) immediately becoming impossible to read without causing Heisenberg to possibly turn in his grave.
adjL
should return a const vector<int>&
.
Upvotes: 9