Reputation: 15297
I know that, we can create the new instance of functions by the following approach. But my question is there any other way to achieve the same?
var Person = function (firstName) {
this.firstName = firstName;
console.log('Person instantiated');
};
var person1 = new Person('Alice');
var person2 = new Person('Bob');
// Show the firstName properties of the objects
console.log('person1 is ' + person1.firstName); // logs "person1 is Alice"
console.log('person2 is ' + person2.firstName); // logs "person2 is Bob"
Since, some time in case of new
declaration fails, i am not getting the error
too..
Especially, in javascript
oops
concept requires the different approach.
Some times, I am confusing without even calling the new
key words it all works fine.. what is the different between using the new
keyword and without using that?
example :
var setColor = function (color) {
return color;
}
var x = setColor('red');
var y = setColor('blue');
console.log(y);
console.log(x);
Upvotes: 2
Views: 2889
Reputation: 101738
The new [Function]
keyword does many things, but the main things it does are:
this
as a reference to the new objectIf you call such a function without new
, the this
reference will be determined the way it would usually be determined when calling a function, and quite often this would be the global object.
One thing you can do to help catch these mistakes more easily is to use strict mode:
"use strict";
var Person = function (firstName) {
this.firstName = firstName;
console.log('Person instantiated');
};
var person1 = Person('Alice');
If the above code were executed, this
would be null
instead of the global object, and you would get an error right away instead of having the properties assigned to the global object (and having hard-to-catch bugs).
A way to avoid these kinds of mistakes with new
altogether is to simply have the function return a new object instead of being a constructor:
var person = function (firstName) {
console.log('person instantiated');
return {
firstName: firstName
};
};
var person1 = person('Alice');
var person2 = person('Bob');
If you do this, it doesn't matter whether you use new
or not, because the function doesn't use this
.
Edit There was a question below about prototypes. If you are unfamiliar with prototypes, this is a feature that allows you to specify properties and methods that will be shared between all instances of an object:
"use strict";
var Person = function (firstName) {
this.firstName = firstName;
console.log('Person instantiated');
};
Person.prototype.getMyName = function () {
return this.firstName;
};
var person1 = new Person('Alice');
console.log(person1.getMyName());
If you do this, then all instances created with new Person()
will share the getMyName
method.
The new
-less option I detailed later on does not provide this automatic prototype extension, but there are alternatives:
Option 1 - don't use a prototype:
var person = function (firstName) {
console.log('person instantiated');
return {
firstName: firstName,
getMyName: function () {
return this.firstName;
}
};
};
Option 2 - Use Object.create()
to extend the prototype:
var person = function (firstName) {
console.log('person instantiated');
var person = Object.create(person.prototype);
person.firstName = firstName;
return person;
};
Option 3 - Use Object.assign()
method to copy the contents of the prototype to a new object:
var person = function (firstName) {
console.log('person instantiated');
return Object.assign({
firstName: firstName
}, person.prototype);
};
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 3469
I think you need a bit better understanding of how objects and prototyping work in Javascript.
Consider you have a use case where you want an object that represents a user
, and stores their first_name
.
Without using any functions, you can simply create an object with your desired properties:
var person = {
first_name: 'joel'
};
This is a standard javascript object - nothing special at all, and no usage of the new keyword to construct it. An alternate syntax to accomplish the same thing would be:
var person = new Object();
person.first_name = 'joel';
Again - this is just a standard object - nothing special at all.
The main reason for creating new
instances of a function, is to use javascript's prototyping system. This is similar to a class in other languages. Let's say you wanted all instances of a person to have a method called getName()
. You could either make sure you create that method on every person you have...
var person = {
first_name: 'joel',
getName: function() {
return this.first_name;
}
};
or...
var person = new Object();
person.first_name = 'joel';
person.getName = function() {
return this.first_name;
};
However a better approach for this kind of thing, where you're always going to want this method defined for every user, is to create a new instance of a person
object, and define the getName
method on the prototype property of the Person function:
function Person() {}
Person.prototype.getName = function() {
return this.first_name;
}
var user = new Person();
user.first_name = 'joel';
console.log(user.getName());
... Or as per your example, you can use a parameter to the Person
constructor function to set the first name property:
function Person(first_name) {
this.first_name = first_name;
}
Person.prototype.getName = function() {
return this.first_name;
};
var user = new Person('joel');
console.log(user.getName());
Note that using this method you would always use the new
keyword when creating a Person
instance. The reason for this becomes clear when you consider the followng:
function Person() {this.first_name = 'joel'; return 'test';}
console.log(window.first_name); // Undefined, as expected
console.log(Person()); // Shows "test";
console.log(window.first_name); // shows "joel".
console.log(new Person()); // Shows "{first_name: 'joel'}"
Note that on line 4 above, you can see that by omitting the new
keyword on a function call that expects you to be using it, you've accidentally modified a property on the window
object, instead of setting it on a new regular object.
Effectively - you can consider usage of the new
keyword to cause the return value of the Person function to be disrecarded, and instead you'll be given back a new instance of the Person Object.
Also note that you can reduce the risk of accidental modifying of the window
object by omitting the new
keyword from inside your function, by checking if this
is equal to window
and returning a new instance of your function instead:
function Person() {
if (this === window) return new Person();
this.first_name = 'joel';
}
With the above, you can instantiate your person
object using either of the following methods and both will have the same effect:
var user1 = new Person();
var user2 = Person();
For some more information on how javascript functions and prototype objects work, I suggest reading http://www.w3schools.com/js/js_object_prototypes.asp
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 25789
Another possible structure using closures and not objects at all
This structure also can be nested creating private static variables
It has no use of the word this
var thing = function(private_var){
function get(){
console.log(private_var)
}
function set(z){
private_var = z
}
return {
get:get,
set:set
}
}
var x = thing(0)
var y = thing(1)
Please note :
This makes certain types of programmers freak out and panic
&& importantly x.say !== y.say
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 439
Using the new
keyword when you call a function sets the context (this
) inside the function to be a newly instantiated object, rather than window
or some other context, which is why you can assign to this.firstName
inside the function, and then refer to it as person1.firstName.
Without using the new
keyword, the value of this
WONT be a blank object, so you will be assigning to window
instead. In this case, you want to use new
since you are using the function as a constructor. If you aren't planning to use the function as a constructor, you don't want to call it with new
.
Upvotes: 2