Reputation: 61
Using Typescript 1.4, say I have a higher-order function with the signature:
interface F<A,B> {
(a: (...x:any[]) => A): (...x:any[]) => B
}
Function 'F' takes function 'a' which has a set of parameters 'x'. Function 'F' returns a new function which has exactly the same set of args as function 'a'.
I've been trying to find a way to express this in Typescript, but i'm coming up short. For example:
interface F<X extends Array<any>,A,B> {
(a: (...x:X) => A): (...x:X) => B
}
the compiler just complains with: error TS2370: A rest parameter must be of an array type.
Although that doesn't feel right anyway, even if it did compile. I guess i'd really need something like:
interface F<X extends Tuple,A,B> {
(a: (...x:X) => A): (...x:X) => B
}
Anyone know if this kind of thing is even possible with Typescript currently (1.4 at time of writing)? or any suggestions?
Example:
(NOTE: This is not my actual use-case, i'm only using logging here as a simple example - please don't focus on that aspect)
// a higher-order function that takes any function and
// returns a new function which takes the same args
// passing them to the original fn and logging the args along with the result
function f(a:(...x:any[]) => any): (...x:any[]) => void {
return (...x:any[]) => {
console.log('('+x.join(',')+') => ', a.apply(undefined, x));
}
}
function a(j:string, k:number): boolean {
return j === String(k);
}
var b = f(a);
b("1", 1);
b("a", 2);
console output:
(1,1) => true
(a,2) => false
So this works, but the derived function 'b' has the implied signature of:
(...x:any[]) => void
ideally i'd like it to have the same arguments as function 'a' ie:
(j: string, k: number) => void
I know I could explicitly define that, but it's very verbose and not at all ideal, kind of defeats the point of having the strong typing in the first place:
var b: (j:string, k:number) => void = f(a);
Upvotes: 4
Views: 8090
Reputation: 361
It's currently not possible to express this in the TypeScript type system. It's a long standing issue which you can follow on https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/issues/212 and https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/issues/5453
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 11
To wrap a function with another that has different return type, one hacky trick is possible with overloading:
function wrap<R>(fn0: ()=> any, p:(f,a)=>R): () => R;
function wrap<R,T>(fn1: (t:T)=> any, p:(f,a)=>R): (t:T) => R;
function wrap<R, T, U>(fn2: (t:T, u:U)=> any, p:(f,a)=>R): (t:T,u:U) => R;
function wrap<R, T, U, V>(fn3: (t:T, u:U, v:V)=> any, p:(f,a)=>R): (t:T,u:U, v:V) => R;
function wrap<R, T, U, V, X>(fn4: (t:T, u:U, v:V, x:X)=> any, p:(f,a)=>R): (t:T,u:U, v:V, x:X) => R;
// ...
function wrap<R>(fn: Function, proc:Function):Function {
return (...args) => proc(fn, args);
}
// wrap is called with two functions fn and proc
// result is a function with argument types from fn and return type of proc
function serialize(fn, args):string {
return JSON.stringify(fn(...args))
}
function foo(a:number,b:string) {
return true;
}
var wrapped = wrap(foo,serialize)
// type is (a:number,b:string) => string
Be careful, it will work only for functions with limited number of arguments.
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 275819
Function 'F' takes function 'a' which has a set of parameters 'x'. Function 'F' returns a new function which has exactly the same set of args as function 'a'.
The specification is a bit unclear, but based on my understanding of what you meant, Here is a sample
// Function 'F' takes function 'a' which has a set of parameters 'x'
// and returns a new function which has exactly the same set of args as function 'a'
function F<A extends Function>(a:A):A{
return a;
}
var foo = F(function(a:number,b:number):void{});
foo (1,3); // okay
foo(1); // ERROR
UPDATE
An example for your use case:
function f<A extends Function>(a:A):A {
var newFunc = (...x:any[]) => {
console.log('('+x.join(',')+') => ', a.apply(undefined, x));
return null;
}
return <any>newFunc;
}
function a(j:string, k:number): boolean {
return j === String(k);
}
var b = f(a);
b("1", 1);
b("a", 2);
b('123','123'); // ERROR
Note: We've capture both the arguments and the return type. I don't see a way to capture just the arguments.
Upvotes: 0