Reputation: 6607
I've been researching a lot of practices around Docker and have come quite far. But there's one thing that keeps on puzzling me, working with data-only containers.
Here's a brief overview of my current setup:
# nginx
web:
extends:
file: _common.yml
service: web
ports:
- "80:80"
environment:
APPLICATION_ENV: prod
volumes_from:
- data
links:
- db
- redis
# php5-cli
app:
extends:
file: _common.yml
service: app
environment:
APPLICATION_ENV: prod
volumes_from:
- data
links:
- db
- redis
data:
image: <censored-url>
volumes:
- "/var/lib/mysql"
- "/app"
# percona
db:
extends:
file: _common.yml
service: db
volumes_from:
- data
# redis
redis:
extends:
file: _common.yml
service: redis
The <censored-url>
that you see is an image build with this Dockerfile:
FROM busybox
COPY . /app
Now this setup works but I just can't figure out how to handle a new release. My source is in git, when I want to deploy to production I imagine I create a new image (FROM busybox should probably be replaced with my existing image url) and pull in the new image on my production server.
But how do I get the data to update for my web container and such? I also have to make sure my persistent data (/var/lib/mysql) remains.
I hope the question is clear, I'd be happy to clarify when necessary.
Upvotes: 2
Views: 2378
Reputation: 46548
Now this setup works but I just can't figure out how to handle a new release. My source is in git, when I want to deploy to production I imagine I create a new image (FROM busybox should probably be replaced with my existing image url) and pull in the new image on my production server.
Apart from the statement about busybox (which I don't follow), that seems pretty much right. Normally, you re-build the images, push to a registry, then pull from the production server. And as @Mario Marin suggests, it's worth being clever about tags, so that you can easily roll-back if needs be and you know exactly which version of your app is deployed.
But how do I get the data to update for my web container and such? I also have to make sure my persistent data (/var/lib/mysql) remains.
I assume this is referring to your data container, which you've done in a bit of an unusual way. To begin with, I would pull out the mysql directory and put it in its own data container. I would use the percona image for this so that all the permissions are set correctly. When you create the data-container, you don't leave it running, so there's no need to worry about the container getting out-of-date; it's really just a namespace for the directory.
The next step is to deal with the app directory, which I assume isn't data, but code? In this case I would include it in your web image (don't use a volume at all). In the Dockerfile I would normally do a git clone to keep the image up-to-date. During development you can mount a volume over the top of the app directory with code from the host so you can make changes instantly.
For more info on data containers, have a look at http://container42.com/2014/11/18/data-only-container-madness/
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 131
I would drop the /app
directory from the data container and build it with docker-compose:
web:
build: .
extends:
file: _common.yml
service: web
ports:
- "80:80"
environment:
APPLICATION_ENV: prod
links:
- db
- redis
app:
extends:
file: _common.yml
service: app
environment:
APPLICATION_ENV: prod
volumes_from:
- data
links:
- db
- redis
data:
volumes:
- "/var/lib/mysql"
db:
extends:
file: _common.yml
service: db
volumes_from:
- data
redis:
extends:
file: _common.yml
service: redis
Dockerfile
FROM busybox
ADD . /app
WORKDIR /app
You can use tags for your different releases, here is a script that I use in my deployments
DOCKER_HUB_USER="therightplace"
DOCKER_COMPOSE_IMAGE="projectname_web_1"
APP_IMAGE="nicer_name"
REMOTE_IMAGE=${DOCKER_HUB_USER}/${APP_IMAGE}
IMAGE_TAG=$(date -u +"%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ" |sed 's/-\|:/_/g')
TAGGED_IMAGE=${REMOTE_IMAGE}:${IMAGE_TAG}
LATEST_IMAGE=${REMOTE_IMAGE}:latest
build_image () {
echo "Building image: ${TAGGED_IMAGE}"
docker-compose build web
}
push_tagged_image () {
echo ${TAGGED_IMAGE}
# change docker-compose image tag for a nicer one
docker tag ${DOCKER_COMPOSE_IMAGE} ${TAGGED_IMAGE}
# push image out to docker hub
docker push ${TAGGED_IMAGE} && echo "${TAGGED_IMAGE} image pushed to docker hub" \
|| echo "Failed to push ${TAGGED_IMAGE} image to docker hub"
}
push_latest_image () {
echo ${LATEST_IMAGE}
# push image out to docker hub
docker tag ${TAGGED_IMAGE} ${LATEST_IMAGE}
docker push ${LATEST_IMAGE} && echo "${LATEST_IMAGE} image pushed to docker hub" \
|| echo "Failed to push ${LATEST_IMAGE} image to docker hub"
}
The script will build the service web and push it to the docker hub. You can omit the pushes and just tag the images.
Instead of using a timestamp for your releases you could use a git hash:
IMAGE_TAG=$(git rev-parse --short HEAD)
Upvotes: 1